Skip to content
effecthub

IndieGTM vs Ocoya

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper
Ocoya — $15/mo vs $39/mo for IndieGTM
Free plan
Neither — IndieGTM has paid plans only, Ocoya has paid plans only
Public API
Ocoya has one; not confirmed by us for IndieGTM
Higher Trust score
Ocoya — 94 vs 73 for IndieGTM
Best fit
IndieGTM: Solo founders who want a steady stream of promotional video content without editing it themselves · Ocoya: Small agencies running 20-150 client social profiles

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactIndieGTMOcoya
CategorySocial Content & CaptionsSocial Media Management
Pricing modelPaidPaid
Starts at$39/mo$15/mo
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score73 / 10094 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, API
CompanyIndieGTMUAB Ocoya
Launched—2021
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 22, 2026

What our research says

IndieGTM

IndieGTM's value is in the volume math: a fixed monthly fee buys a defined number of standard and higher-effort videos plus daily text and image posts, which suits founders who'd otherwise pay per video elsewhere. There's no free tier to test output quality first, so the $39 entry price is a real commitment before you know if the generated videos are good enough to actually post.

Pros

  • Clear, published pricing with exact video counts per tier
  • Scales from solo founder (Starter) to agency-scale (Studio)
  • Add-on video packs let you buy more without a full plan upgrade
  • Daily text and image posts included alongside video generation

Cons

  • No free trial or free tier to evaluate video quality before paying
  • No information on company ownership or location
  • 1080p export cap on every tier, no higher resolution option mentioned

Ocoya

The per-profile economics are the story: 50 social profiles for $79 undercuts Buffer and Later badly if you manage many accounts. Sold as a single-brand tool it is unremarkable; sold as an agency tool it is one of the cheaper credible options.

Pros

  • Profile counts per dollar beat most mainstream schedulers at the agency tiers
  • Copy, image generation and scheduling live in one screen instead of three tools
  • Public API with self-serve key generation, plus an MCP server for Claude and ChatGPT
  • Workspace separation makes client isolation straightforward

Cons

  • AI credits are metered separately from posting and run out fast on the $15 tier's 100
  • Analytics are basic compared with Sprout or Hootsuite
  • The published terms date to 2022, which is a stale legal surface for a 2026 product
  • Small Lithuanian team means limited support hours across US timezones

Which one fits

Choose IndieGTM if you need

  • Solo founders who want a steady stream of promotional video content without editing it themselves
  • Agencies running multiple campaigns that need a predictable monthly video budget
  • Teams who already have a URL or product idea and want content generated from it directly

Choose Ocoya if you need

  • Small agencies running 20-150 client social profiles
  • Ecommerce brands auto-posting from a Shopify or WooCommerce product feed
  • Teams that need a client approval step before anything publishes
  • Anyone wanting to drive scheduling from a script or an AI assistant via MCP

IndieGTM vs Ocoya: the questions people ask

Is IndieGTM cheaper than Ocoya?

On published entry prices, Ocoya starts lower — $15/mo against $39/mo for IndieGTM. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Which has a public API, IndieGTM or Ocoya?

Ocoya ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for IndieGTM is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

Browse all Social Content & Captions →