Skip to content
effecthub

Digibate vs Ocoya

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Neither — Digibate has paid plans only, Ocoya has paid plans only
Public API
Ocoya has one; not confirmed by us for Digibate
Higher Trust score
Ocoya — 94 vs 84 for Digibate
Best fit
Digibate: Small businesses and solopreneurs without a dedicated social media manager · Ocoya: Small agencies running 20-150 client social profiles
Status
Both up at our last check — Digibate Oct 15, 2026, Ocoya Oct 22, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

DigibateGenerates social posts, product photos and video, then schedules and auto-publishes them across platforms for small businesses.OcoyaSocial scheduling with built-in AI copy, graphics and automations

Side by side

FactDigibateOcoya
CategorySocial Media ManagementSocial Media Management
Pricing modelPaidPaid
Starts at—$15/mo
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score84 / 10094 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, API
CompanyDigibate Groups ApSUAB Ocoya
Launched—2021
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 22, 2026

What our research says

Digibate

Digibate's Brand DNA scanner and autopilot scheduling target a real pain point for solo operators and small teams: keeping a consistent visual brand across daily posts without a designer. Pricing in Danish kroner and a 7-day trial instead of a free tier make it a slightly bigger commitment to test than competitors with permanent free plans, and the entry-tier credit cap (300/month) limits how much you can automate before upgrading.

Pros

  • Combines content generation, product photography and scheduling in one platform
  • Brand DNA scanner aims for visual consistency instead of generic AI output
  • Supports 90+ languages and direct publishing to five major platforms

Cons

  • Only a 7-day free trial, not an ongoing free tier
  • Entry-tier credit allowance (300/month) is limited for active daily posting

Ocoya

The per-profile economics are the story: 50 social profiles for $79 undercuts Buffer and Later badly if you manage many accounts. Sold as a single-brand tool it is unremarkable; sold as an agency tool it is one of the cheaper credible options.

Pros

  • Profile counts per dollar beat most mainstream schedulers at the agency tiers
  • Copy, image generation and scheduling live in one screen instead of three tools
  • Public API with self-serve key generation, plus an MCP server for Claude and ChatGPT
  • Workspace separation makes client isolation straightforward

Cons

  • AI credits are metered separately from posting and run out fast on the $15 tier's 100
  • Analytics are basic compared with Sprout or Hootsuite
  • The published terms date to 2022, which is a stale legal surface for a 2026 product
  • Small Lithuanian team means limited support hours across US timezones

Which one fits

Choose Digibate if you need

  • Small businesses and solopreneurs without a dedicated social media manager
  • E-commerce brands wanting AI product photography alongside social scheduling
  • Teams publishing in multiple languages across several platforms

Choose Ocoya if you need

  • Small agencies running 20-150 client social profiles
  • Ecommerce brands auto-posting from a Shopify or WooCommerce product feed
  • Teams that need a client approval step before anything publishes
  • Anyone wanting to drive scheduling from a script or an AI assistant via MCP

Digibate vs Ocoya: the questions people ask

Is Digibate cheaper than Ocoya?

Ocoya starts at $15/mo. An entry price for Digibate is not confirmed by us yet, so check its pricing page before you compare.

Which has a public API, Digibate or Ocoya?

Ocoya ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Digibate is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

More comparisons

Browse all Social Media Management →