Skip to content
effecthub

Hootsuite vs MagicPost

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
Hootsuite from $99/seat/mo, MagicPost from $21/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan
Neither — Hootsuite has paid plans only, MagicPost has paid plans only
Public API
Both have one
Best fit
Hootsuite: Mid-size and enterprise social teams managing many accounts and approvals · MagicPost: Founders and consultants building an audience on LinkedIn specifically
Platforms
Hootsuite: Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension · MagicPost: Web

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactHootsuiteMagicPost
CategorySocial Media ManagementSocial Media Management
Pricing modelPaidPaid
Starts at$99/seat/mo$21/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score86 / 10088 / 100
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, APIWeb, API
CompanyHootsuite Inc.MagicPost
Launched20082024
Last verifiedOct 29, 2026Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

Hootsuite

Hootsuite suits marketing and customer-care teams that manage many brand accounts and need publishing, a shared inbox, listening and reporting in one contract, with AI drafting built in. At $99 per user a month before monthly-billing markup, it is expensive for solo creators and small businesses that only need to schedule posts.

Pros

  • Covers publishing, inbox, listening, analytics and employee advocacy in one suite
  • Wisdom AI is included in every plan, connected to the account's own social data
  • Unlimited social accounts from the Professional plan
  • Long track record and broad network support

Cons

  • Per-user pricing starts at $99 a month on annual billing, high for small teams
  • Standard caps you at 10 social accounts
  • No free plan; the trial limits daily posts and disables bulk scheduling

MagicPost

Narrow on purpose, and it shows in the details - hook generation, LinkedIn-shaped analytics and lead spotting on your own engagement list are things a general scheduler does badly. The MCP server is an unusual and genuinely useful addition. If you post anywhere other than LinkedIn you will need a second tool.

Pros

  • Exposes an MCP server so assistants can post and read analytics directly
  • Detects likely leads among the people engaging with your posts
  • Post idea and hook generation tuned to LinkedIn's format rather than generic captions
  • Trial requires no card

Cons

  • LinkedIn only - no other network is supported
  • No free plan, only a trial
  • Analytics tier at $21 excludes the generation features that make the product interesting

Which one fits

Choose Hootsuite if you need

  • Mid-size and enterprise social teams managing many accounts and approvals
  • Brands that combine publishing with customer care and social listening
  • Regulated organisations that need SSO and compliance options on Enterprise

Choose MagicPost if you need

  • Founders and consultants building an audience on LinkedIn specifically
  • Turning post engagement into an outbound list
  • Teams that want an AI assistant to drive posting through MCP

Hootsuite vs MagicPost: the questions people ask

Is Hootsuite cheaper than MagicPost?

They charge in different units, so there is no like-for-like answer: Hootsuite starts at $99/seat/mo, MagicPost at $21/mo. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it.

Which has a public API, Hootsuite or MagicPost?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

All MagicPost alternatives →Browse all Social Media Management →