Skip to content
effecthub

Dromeas vs Greptile

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
Dromeas from $25/mo, Greptile from $30/seat/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Greptile — 85 vs 62 for Dromeas
Best fit
Dromeas: teams wanting automated review on every PR and trunk commit, not just on demand · Greptile: Teams whose bugs come from cross-file coupling rather than local mistakes

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

DromeasRuns AI code review on every pull request and trunk commit, then automates the release management around it.GreptileIndexes the whole repo, then reviews pull requests with cross-file context rather than diff-only context.

Side by side

FactDromeasGreptile
CategoryCode Review & QualityCode Review & Quality
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$25/mo$30/seat/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score62 / 10085 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, API
Company—Tabnam, Inc.
Launched—2023
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Dromeas

Positions itself against a single-model code reviewer by running several AI models together across quality, security, compliance and docs, then extending into release management rather than stopping at the review comment. The MCP server is a real, checkable differentiator for teams already working inside MCP-connected AI assistants. Who runs the company could not be confirmed from the site itself.

Pros

  • reviews every PR and trunk commit automatically, not just on request
  • uses multiple AI models together rather than a single reviewer
  • MCP server works directly inside common AI-assisted IDEs

Cons

  • credit-based pricing makes cost harder to predict than flat per-seat plans
  • company and founding details are not disclosed on the site
  • private-repo support requires the paid tier, since the free tier is public-repo only

Greptile

The full-repo index is the difference that matters - it flags cross-file breakage that diff-only reviewers miss entirely. Billing only for developers who actually got a review that month is a fairer meter than flat per-seat. The 50 credits per seat go quickly on an active team, and $1 per extra review is where the real bill forms.

Pros

  • Indexes the whole codebase, so reviews carry cross-file context
  • Learns from the PR comments your team already writes
  • Seats bill only for developers who actually received a review that period
  • GitHub and GitLab plus an MCP server, an API and a self-hosting option

Cons

  • Credit model means an active repo will exceed the 50 included reviews per seat
  • Overage at $1 per review adds up quietly on a busy month
  • Free tier is capped at a single active developer

Which one fits

Choose Dromeas if you need

  • teams wanting automated review on every PR and trunk commit, not just on demand
  • engineering orgs already using MCP-connected AI assistants in their IDE
  • teams who want release management bundled with code review rather than as a separate tool

Choose Greptile if you need

  • Teams whose bugs come from cross-file coupling rather than local mistakes
  • Enforcing repo-specific conventions through custom rules
  • Orgs that need self-hosted review for code that cannot leave their network

Dromeas vs Greptile: the questions people ask

Is Dromeas cheaper than Greptile?

They charge in different units, so there is no like-for-like answer: Dromeas starts at $25/mo, Greptile at $30/seat/mo. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it.

Does Dromeas or Greptile have a free tier?

Both: Dromeas has a free tier, and Greptile has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Dromeas or Greptile?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

More comparisons

Browse all Code Review & Quality →