Codoki Lens vs Greptile

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price: Codoki Lens from $15/mo, Greptile from $30/seat/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan: Only Greptile (Codoki Lens has paid plans only)
Public API: Greptile has one; not confirmed by us for Codoki Lens
Best fit: Codoki Lens: Small engineering teams on GitHub wanting a second reviewer focused on must-fix issues · Greptile: Teams whose bugs come from cross-file coupling rather than local mistakes
Trust score: About even — Codoki Lens 82, Greptile 85

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Codoki LensGitHub app that reviews pull requests for bugs, security and code quality and returns one structured review with a merge status.

GreptileIndexes the whole repo, then reviews pull requests with cross-file context rather than diff-only context.

Side by side

Fact	Codoki Lens	Greptile
Category	Code Review & Quality	Code Review & Quality
Pricing model	Paid	Freemium
Starts at	$15/mo	$30/seat/mo
Public API	Not confirmed	Yes
Trust score	82 / 100	85 / 100
Platforms	Web	Web, API
Company	Codoki AI Ltd	Tabnam, Inc.
Launched	—	2023
Last verified	Oct 15, 2026	Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Codoki Lens

Codoki Lens is a focused PR reviewer that runs code in a sandbox as well as reading it and filters findings by confidence, so the review it posts leans toward must-fix issues rather than style noise. Pricing is easy to budget: Starter for a freelancer at $15 a month billed yearly, Pro per developer for a team. It is a small London company that also runs an agency, competing with much larger review tools, and it is GitHub-only for now.

Pros

Runs tests in an isolated sandbox alongside static checks instead of only reading the diff
Confidence-gated findings aim to skip style nits and duplicates
Installs as a GitHub app with per-repository rules and no pipeline changes
7-day free trial before paying

Cons

Starter caps reviews at 150 a month, which a busy repo can exceed
GitHub only today; GitLab and Bitbucket are listed as in progress
Small team whose main business is now custom software work, so support capacity is a question
Marketing claims such as halving review time and bugs are not independently verifiable

Greptile

The full-repo index is the difference that matters - it flags cross-file breakage that diff-only reviewers miss entirely. Billing only for developers who actually got a review that month is a fairer meter than flat per-seat. The 50 credits per seat go quickly on an active team, and $1 per extra review is where the real bill forms.

Pros

Indexes the whole codebase, so reviews carry cross-file context
Learns from the PR comments your team already writes
Seats bill only for developers who actually received a review that period
GitHub and GitLab plus an MCP server, an API and a self-hosting option

Cons

Credit model means an active repo will exceed the 50 included reviews per seat
Overage at $1 per review adds up quietly on a busy month
Free tier is capped at a single active developer

Which one fits

Choose Codoki Lens if you need

Small engineering teams on GitHub wanting a second reviewer focused on must-fix issues
Freelancers and solo developers who want reviews without a per-seat bill
Teams that want PR descriptions and review rules handled by the same app

Choose Greptile if you need

Teams whose bugs come from cross-file coupling rather than local mistakes
Enforcing repo-specific conventions through custom rules
Orgs that need self-hosted review for code that cannot leave their network