Skip to content
effecthub

Codoki AI vs Greptile

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Codoki AI starts at $15, Greptile at $30. Only Greptile has a free tier. Only Greptile ships a public API.

Codoki AIReviews pull requests for bugs, security issues, and logic errors, and posts one consolidated comment per PR.GreptileIndexes the whole repo, then reviews pull requests with cross-file context rather than diff-only context.

Side by side

FactCodoki AIGreptile
CategoryCode Review & QualityCode Review & Quality
Pricing modelPaidFreemium
Starts at$15 month$30 seat_month
Public APINoYes
PlatformsWebWeb, API
CompanyCodoki AI LtdGreptile
Launched—2023
Last verifiedSep 1, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Codoki AI

Codoki AI's single-comment-per-PR approach is a deliberate answer to review tools that bury useful feedback in dozens of inline comments, and the per-developer Pro tier is straightforward to budget for a growing team. It's a small, self-funded company competing against well-funded code review tools, so long-term roadmap and support capacity are worth watching.

Pros

  • Posts one consolidated comment instead of scattering inline noise
  • Starter tier is priced for individuals and small teams
  • Installs directly as a GitHub app with no separate dashboard workflow
  • 7-day free trial with no card required

Cons

  • Starter caps reviews at 150/month, which a busy repo can exceed
  • Small, self-funded team means limited support headcount
  • Bug-catch-rate claims on the marketing page aren't independently verifiable

Greptile

The full-repo index is the difference that matters - it flags cross-file breakage that diff-only reviewers miss entirely. Billing only for developers who actually got a review that month is a fairer meter than flat per-seat. The 50 credits per seat go quickly on an active team, and $1 per extra review is where the real bill forms.

Pros

  • Indexes the whole codebase, so reviews carry cross-file context
  • Learns from the PR comments your team already writes
  • Seats bill only for developers who actually received a review that period
  • GitHub and GitLab plus an MCP server, an API and a self-hosting option

Cons

  • Credit model means an active repo will exceed the 50 included reviews per seat
  • Overage at $1 per review adds up quietly on a busy month
  • Free tier is capped at a single active developer

Which one fits

Choose Codoki AI if you need

  • Small engineering teams wanting consolidated PR feedback
  • Freelancers and solo developers wanting a second reviewer
  • Teams standardizing on GitHub who want an installable app, not a new dashboard

Choose Greptile if you need

  • Teams whose bugs come from cross-file coupling rather than local mistakes
  • Enforcing repo-specific conventions through custom rules
  • Orgs that need self-hosted review for code that cannot leave their network

More comparisons

All Codoki AI alternatives →Browse all Code Review & Quality →