Skip to content
effecthub

Loopa vs Manus

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Loopa — $17/mo vs $20/mo for Manus
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Manus has one; not confirmed by us for Loopa
Higher Trust score
Manus — 79 vs 61 for Loopa
Best fit
Loopa: one-off deliverables like decks, briefs or small sites · Manus: Knowledge workers who want a report, deck or small site produced end to end from a brief

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactLoopaManus
CategoryAI Agents & Autonomous WorkersAI Agents & Autonomous Workers
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$17/mo$20/mo
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score61 / 10079 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android, API
Company—Butterfly Effect Pte. Ltd.
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Loopa

Loopa is priced like a consumer subscription for something that behaves like an agent workbench: daily free credits, a cheap Pro tier, and output in the file formats people actually send. Multi-model routing and user-written skills give it more room than a single-model assistant. Against that: no company name, no API, and credits you cannot easily forecast.

Pros

  • Returns finished files: PPTX, PDF, DOCX, XLSX and HTML
  • Routes across Claude, GPT, Gemini, Qwen and DeepSeek
  • Telegram, Discord and email triggers
  • 600 free credits a day without paying

Cons

  • No legal entity or country disclosed anywhere on the site
  • No public API
  • Credits, not tasks, are the unit — cost per job is unpredictable

Manus

Manus is for delegating a whole task — research a market, build a small site, clean a dataset — and reading the result later, with a replayable trail of what the agent did. It is strongest on bounded, verifiable jobs and weakest when the task needs judgement calls mid-way, and the credit meter makes long multi-step runs expensive to repeat: a failed run costs the same as a good one.

Pros

  • Runs in its own cloud sandbox with browser, terminal and files, so nothing is installed locally
  • Step-by-step progress and session replay make the agent's work auditable
  • Published plans: Free with daily credits, Pro from $20, Team from $20 a seat with pooled credits
  • Bring-your-own API key is supported on Team for model access

Cons

  • Credits are consumed by run time and tool calls, so cost per finished task is hard to predict
  • The original Basic and Plus plans were folded into Pro, and the pricing page itself shows no figures without JavaScript
  • Operator is a Singapore entity with disputes under SIAC arbitration, which matters for enterprise procurement

Which one fits

Choose Loopa if you need

  • one-off deliverables like decks, briefs or small sites
  • people who want scheduled, recurring agent runs
  • cheap experimentation across several model families

Choose Manus if you need

  • Knowledge workers who want a report, deck or small site produced end to end from a brief
  • Teams that want pooled credits and shared workspaces on a per-seat plan
  • Trying autonomous agents without setting up a sandbox yourself

Loopa vs Manus: the questions people ask

Is Loopa cheaper than Manus?

On published entry prices, Loopa starts lower — $17/mo against $20/mo for Manus. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Loopa or Manus have a free tier?

Both: Loopa has a free tier, and Manus has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Loopa or Manus?

Manus ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Loopa is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Loopa alternatives →Browse all AI Agents & Autonomous Workers →