Conductor vs Munder Difflin

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan: Munder Difflin — $20/mo vs $50/mo for Conductor
Free plan: Both have one
Public API: Conductor has one; not confirmed by us for Munder Difflin
Best fit: Conductor: Developers juggling several features or bug fixes with coding agents at once · Munder Difflin: Developers already paying for Claude Code or Codex who want their agents coordinated rather than run one at a time
Platforms: Conductor: macOS, iOS · Munder Difflin: macOS, Windows, Linux

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

ConductorMac app for running Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode agents in parallel, each in its own isolated workspace.

Munder DifflinOpen-source desktop harness that runs Claude Code, Codex and ten more terminal agents as one office of clones on your machine

Side by side

Fact	Conductor	Munder Difflin
Category	AI Coding Assistants	Agent Frameworks & Orchestration
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Starts at	$50/mo	$20/mo
Public API	Yes	Not confirmed
Trust score	83 / 100	80 / 100
Platforms	macOS, iOS, API	macOS, Windows, Linux
Company	Melty Labs	Chaitanya Giri
Launched	—	2026
Last verified	Oct 2, 2026	Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Conductor

A tidy control room for developers who already use terminal coding agents and want to run several at once with clean isolation and a review step. It adds orchestration rather than its own model, so you still pay your agent providers. Anyone happy with a single agent in an editor will not gain much.

Pros

Free tier with local workspaces and bring-your-own subscriptions or keys
Each task isolated in its own workspace and branch
Supports Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode agents
SOC 2 Type II badge shown on the site

Cons

Desktop app is Mac-only
Cloud workspaces need the paid Pro plan
Cloud compute pricing is expected to move to usage-based billing

Munder Difflin

Munder Difflin is MIT-licensed and free at its core: the clones cost nothing beyond whatever Claude Code, Codex or Gemini plan you already pay for, and the orchestration, task board and memory are in the free app. Pro sells a different interface and local dictation rather than gating the multi-agent part, which is unusual for this category, but it is one person's project and all sales are final.

Pros

Core harness is free, open-source, and MIT-licensed rather than a gated trial
Runs locally on macOS, Windows and Linux, so code and keys stay on the machine
Coordinates twelve established coding-agent CLIs instead of building a new one
Pro is a fixed-term payment that never auto-renews

Cons

Built and maintained by one developer with no company behind it, a real continuity risk
Paid licences are non-refundable
Agents stop when your machine sleeps; remote control and hosted sandboxes are not out yet

Which one fits

Choose Conductor if you need

Developers juggling several features or bug fixes with coding agents at once
Teams that want agents in cloud sandboxes with shared, live workspaces
Claude Code and Codex users who want a diff-and-PR workflow around them

Choose Munder Difflin if you need

Developers already paying for Claude Code or Codex who want their agents coordinated rather than run one at a time
Solo builders juggling several projects, each in its own floor of agents
People who want local meeting transcription handed straight to their coding agents