Conductor
Verified Oct 2, 2026 ActiveMac app for running Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode agents in parallel, each in its own isolated workspace.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Freemium
- Paid options from
- $50/mo
- Billing
- Monthly
The Mac app is free and works with your own agent subscriptions or keys. Pro is $50 per month and adds Conductor Cloud workspaces, multiplayer for up to five Pro users, the API and the mobile app; Teams is $60 per user per month and is currently invite-only. Cloud compute is included for now, but the site says usage-based pricing will be introduced later.
Use tool ↗About Conductor
Conductor lets a developer run several coding agents at once without them stepping on each other: every task gets its own workspace, branch, files, terminal and diff. You review the changes, open a pull request, merge and archive the workspace from one window. It runs the first-party Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode agents under the hood with your own subscriptions or API keys, and a paid cloud option runs each agent in an isolated microVM. There is also an iOS app, an API and a multiplayer mode for sharing workspaces with teammates. It is made by Melty Labs of San Francisco.
- API
- Yes
- Last verified
- Oct 2, 2026
Verified sources
- Pricing: Free, Pro $50 per month, Teams $60 per user per month, Enterprise customconductor.build ↗
- Runs Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode in parallel with isolated workspaces; macOS, iOS and APIconductor.build ↗
- Docs: each task gets its own workspace, branch, diff and review pathdocs.conductor.build ↗
- YC Summer 2024 company founded 2024 by Charlie Holtz and Jackson de Campos, San Franciscoycombinator.com ↗
Is Conductor legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- Last checked
- Oct 2, 2026The site answered
- Operated by
- Melty Labs, United StatesOur research, card verified Oct 2, 2026
Pros & cons of Conductor
A tidy control room for developers who already use terminal coding agents and want to run several at once with clean isolation and a review step. It adds orchestration rather than its own model, so you still pay your agent providers. Anyone happy with a single agent in an editor will not gain much.
Pros
- Free tier with local workspaces and bring-your-own subscriptions or keys
- Each task isolated in its own workspace and branch
- Supports Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode agents
- SOC 2 Type II badge shown on the site
Cons
- Desktop app is Mac-only
- Cloud workspaces need the paid Pro plan
- Cloud compute pricing is expected to move to usage-based billing
Best for
- Developers juggling several features or bug fixes with coding agents at once
- Teams that want agents in cloud sandboxes with shared, live workspaces
- Claude Code and Codex users who want a diff-and-PR workflow around them
Not for
- Windows or Linux users, since the desktop app targets macOS
- People who want a built-in model and a single flat subscription covering inference
Watch out: Conductor does not include model usage: agent costs come from your own Claude, OpenAI or other accounts, and the vendor says cloud compute will become usage-billed, so today's flat Pro price may change.
Top alternatives to Conductor
Amazon Q Developer69AWS's coding and operations assistant for IDEs, the terminal and the console, with its IDE plugins now on an end-of-support clock.Not rated yetFrom $19/seat/moConductor head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.
AI tools by profession
AI Coding Assistants is one of the jobs on this page: