CodeRabbit vs Codoki Lens

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price: CodeRabbit from $24/seat/mo, Codoki Lens from $15/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan: Only CodeRabbit (Codoki Lens has paid plans only)
Public API: CodeRabbit has one; not confirmed by us for Codoki Lens
Higher Trust score: CodeRabbit — 92 vs 82 for Codoki Lens
Best fit: CodeRabbit: Teams reviewing high volumes of AI-generated pull requests · Codoki Lens: Small engineering teams on GitHub wanting a second reviewer focused on must-fix issues

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

CodeRabbitAI reviewer that comments on GitHub and GitLab pull requests, triages them by risk and flags security issues

Codoki LensGitHub app that reviews pull requests for bugs, security and code quality and returns one structured review with a merge status.

Side by side

Fact	CodeRabbit	Codoki Lens
Category	Code Review & Quality	Code Review & Quality
Pricing model	Freemium	Paid
Starts at	$24/seat/mo	$15/mo
Public API	Yes	Not confirmed
Trust score	92 / 100	82 / 100
Platforms	Web, VS Code extension, API	Web
Company	CodeRabbit, Inc.	Codoki AI Ltd
Launched	2023	—
Last verified	Oct 16, 2026	Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

CodeRabbit

The most sensible fit is a team merging a steady stream of agent-generated PRs that no human can fully read. The catch is the fair-usage meter: even paid seats are capped at a handful of PR reviews per developer per hour, and the bot's default verbosity takes tuning.

Pros

Installs on GitHub/GitLab in minutes and starts commenting immediately
Free forever for public open-source repositories
Review surface extends to IDE and CLI, not just the PR page
Learns team conventions over time and applies them to later reviews

Cons

Per-hour review caps apply on every tier, including Enterprise
Comment volume can feel noisy until you tune it down
API access and self-hosting are locked behind the Enterprise tier

Codoki Lens

Codoki Lens is a focused PR reviewer that runs code in a sandbox as well as reading it and filters findings by confidence, so the review it posts leans toward must-fix issues rather than style noise. Pricing is easy to budget: Starter for a freelancer at $15 a month billed yearly, Pro per developer for a team. It is a small London company that also runs an agency, competing with much larger review tools, and it is GitHub-only for now.

Pros

Runs tests in an isolated sandbox alongside static checks instead of only reading the diff
Confidence-gated findings aim to skip style nits and duplicates
Installs as a GitHub app with per-repository rules and no pipeline changes
7-day free trial before paying

Cons

Starter caps reviews at 150 a month, which a busy repo can exceed
GitHub only today; GitLab and Bitbucket are listed as in progress
Small team whose main business is now custom software work, so support capacity is a question
Marketing claims such as halving review time and bugs are not independently verifiable

Which one fits

Choose CodeRabbit if you need

Teams reviewing high volumes of AI-generated pull requests
Open-source maintainers, since public repos are reviewed free
Organizations that want review, PR triage and security scanning from one vendor

Choose Codoki Lens if you need

Small engineering teams on GitHub wanting a second reviewer focused on must-fix issues
Freelancers and solo developers who want reviews without a per-seat bill
Teams that want PR descriptions and review rules handled by the same app