Skip to content
effecthub

008 Agent vs Bland AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper
Bland AI — $0.14/min vs $0.39/min for 008 Agent
Free plan
Neither — 008 Agent has paid plans only, Bland AI has paid plans only
Public API
Both have one
Best fit
008 Agent: Teams that want a voice agent live quickly without a dev sprint · Bland AI: Teams replacing IVR menus with agents that can be interrupted
Trust score
About even — 008 Agent 87, Bland AI 89

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

008 AgentVoice AI agents that answer calls, update CRMs, and run scripted actions, billed per minute plus a monthly seat.Bland AIPhone-call agents billed per minute, with the language model, transcription and voice included in the rate

Side by side

Fact008 AgentBland AI
CategoryVoice Agents & Phone AIVoice Agents & Phone AI
Pricing modelPaidPaid
Starts at$0.39/min$0.14/min
Public APIYesYes
Trust score87 / 10089 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, API
Company008 TECHNOLOGIES, S.L.Bland
Launched—2023
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

008 Agent

008 Agent's pitch is speed of setup for voice agents that can actually take actions mid-call, not just transcribe. The per-minute pricing with an optional monthly instance fee rewards high call volume and penalizes low, sporadic usage.

Pros

  • Agents can take real actions - tickets, CRM updates, web search - not just talk
  • Entry tier has no monthly commitment, only per-minute usage
  • Built-in integrations with common CRM and helpdesk tools

Cons

  • No published flat-rate plan for predictable monthly budgeting at low volume
  • Even the pay-as-you-go tier starts with a demo request rather than self-serve sign-up
  • Per-minute pricing makes costs harder to forecast than a seat-based plan

Bland AI

Bland quotes one per-minute rate that already includes the language model, transcription and voice, and publishes its compliance certifications, which makes cost modelling simpler than on platforms that pass through several vendor bills. Telephony is still a separate line, and the cheap entry rate comes with tight call caps, so real call-centre volume moves you onto the $299 monthly Build fee or an enterprise contract.

Pros

  • Per-minute rate covers model, transcription and voice with no token charges
  • Documented REST API with batch dispatch and in-call tools
  • SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA with a BAA, GDPR and PCI DSS compliance stated
  • Free start credits and an inbound number without a card
  • Bring-your-own Twilio or SIP trunk is supported and waives transfer fees

Cons

  • Concurrency, daily caps, voices and many call features are gated by tier
  • Build adds a $299 monthly fee on top of minutes, and the mid-size Scale tier has been dropped
  • Telephony is billed on top of the per-minute AI rate
  • A closed in-house stack means less choice of underlying models

Which one fits

Choose 008 Agent if you need

  • Teams that want a voice agent live quickly without a dev sprint
  • Businesses with high call volume that benefits from the discounted per-minute tiers
  • Companies already using Zendesk, Salesforce, or HubSpot

Choose Bland AI if you need

  • Teams replacing IVR menus with agents that can be interrupted
  • Outbound qualification and appointment confirmation at volume
  • Regulated industries needing HIPAA or PCI paperwork on file

008 Agent vs Bland AI: the questions people ask

Is 008 Agent cheaper than Bland AI?

On published entry prices, Bland AI starts lower — $0.14/min against $0.39/min for 008 Agent. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Which has a public API, 008 Agent or Bland AI?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

More comparisons

All 008 Agent alternatives →Browse all Voice Agents & Phone AI →