SpriteCook
Verified Oct 15, 2026 ActiveGenerates game-ready pixel art sprites, animations, and tilesets from text prompts, exportable to major engines.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Freemium
- Paid options from
- $8/mo
- Billing
- Monthly
Free tier gives 40 credits every 30 days. Starter is $8/month for 800 credits, Adventurer $30/month for 3,000 credits, Archmage $70/month for 7,000 credits; a sprite costs about 8 credits and an animation about 20.
Use tool ↗About SpriteCook
SpriteCook turns text descriptions into game art: animated characters, sprite sheets, tilesets, props, textures, and UI elements, kept visually consistent through style packs. A character animator handles frame-by-frame motion, and finished assets export as transparent PNGs or sprite sheets compatible with Unity, Godot, Phaser, and GameMaker. It also connects to AI coding agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, and VS Code Copilot through an MCP server, so a developer can request sprites without leaving their editor. Pricing runs on a credit system; a free tier gives 40 credits every 30 days, with generation costing roughly 8 credits per sprite or 20 per animation. No company name or country is disclosed beyond the product's own branding.
- Platforms
- Web · API
- API
- Yes
- Last verified
- Oct 15, 2026
Verified sources
- Describes asset types, engine export formats, and MCP integrationspritecook.ai ↗
- Lists Free/Starter $8/Adventurer $30/Archmage $70 monthly credit tiersspritecook.ai ↗
Is SpriteCook legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- Domain registered
- Oct 6, 2025 (1 year ago)Registry record (RDAP), registrar NameCheap, Inc., looked up Sep 12, 2026
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Let's Encrypt, valid until Jan 12, 2027Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 15, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 15, 2026The site answered
Pros & cons of SpriteCook
SpriteCook fits a specific niche well: indie developers who need consistent-looking sprite sheets fast and want them to land directly in Unity or Godot, or even straight into an AI coding agent via MCP. Credit costs scale with how much art a project needs, so a game with a large cast or many animation states will burn through the cheaper tiers quickly.
Pros
- Exports directly in formats Unity, Godot, Phaser, and GameMaker expect
- Style packs help keep a project's assets visually consistent
- MCP server lets coding agents request sprites mid-development
- Free tier is enough to test the workflow before paying
Cons
- Credit costs scale quickly for projects with many characters or animation states
- No company name or location disclosed, which matters for support accountability
Best for
- Solo or small-team game developers needing placeholder or production sprite art fast
- Developers using AI coding agents who want sprite generation inside their existing workflow
Not for
- Studios needing a fully custom, hand-illustrated art style
- Projects needing 3D assets rather than 2D pixel art
Alternatives to SpriteCook
SpriteCook head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.