Skip to content
effecthub

Otter.ai vs Sonix

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
Otter.ai from $8.33/seat/mo, Sonix from $25/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan
Only Otter.ai (Sonix has paid plans only)
Public API
Both have one
Best fit
Otter.ai: Teams that live in Zoom, Meet or Teams and want notes without a note-taker · Sonix: Journalists and researchers cleaning up long interview recordings
Platforms
Otter.ai: Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, Chrome extension · Sonix: Web

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactOtter.aiSonix
CategoryMeeting AssistantsSpeech-to-Text & Transcription
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at$8.33/seat/mo$25/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score94 / 10094 / 100
PlatformsWeb, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, APIWeb, API
CompanyOtter.aiSonix, Inc.
Launched20162017
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Otter.ai

Still the default for English-language meeting notes, and the free tier is unusually usable. What determines the right plan is not features but the per-conversation ceiling: 30 minutes on Basic and 90 on Pro means a standard hour-long review truncates on the free tier and a workshop truncates on Pro. Pick the tier by your longest recurring meeting.

Pros

  • 300 free minutes a month makes evaluation real rather than token
  • Annual Pro at $8.33 is roughly half the month-to-month rate
  • An MCP server is exposed from the free tier, so assistants can query transcripts without the paid API
  • Business removes the minute cap entirely rather than raising it

Cons

  • The API and webhooks require Enterprise, which is quote-only
  • Per-conversation ceilings (30 min free, 90 min Pro) cut recordings mid-meeting
  • Basic allows three file imports in total, not per month
  • Month-to-month pricing is roughly double annual at both self-serve tiers

Sonix

Pick Sonix when the transcript is a working document you will correct, subtitle and hand off — the editor is the product, not the ASR. If you mainly want live meeting notes, Otter is cheaper and better suited; if the recording is legally critical, Rev's human tier is the safer route.

Pros

  • The word-locked editor makes correcting a long transcript far faster than re-typing
  • 50+ languages for both transcription and translation, priced at the same hourly rate
  • REST API with batch processing and custom vocabulary is included with subscriptions
  • SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA posture and a stated no-training policy on customer files

Cons

  • Per-seat pricing at $25/mo each punishes small teams sharing one library
  • Hour allowances are the real constraint; Core's 5 hrs/mo goes fast on video
  • The 99% accuracy claim is vendor marketing — independent tests put it near peers, around the mid-90s
  • No free plan, only a 30-minute trial

Which one fits

Choose Otter.ai if you need

  • Teams that live in Zoom, Meet or Teams and want notes without a note-taker
  • Accessibility use, where live captions matter as much as the transcript
  • Recruiters and researchers who need searchable interview records across a workspace

Choose Sonix if you need

  • Journalists and researchers cleaning up long interview recordings
  • Video teams producing multilingual subtitle tracks from one master file
  • Legal, medical and academic work where custom vocabulary matters
  • Engineering teams batch-transcribing a media archive through the API

Otter.ai vs Sonix: the questions people ask

Is Otter.ai cheaper than Sonix?

They charge in different units, so there is no like-for-like answer: Otter.ai starts at $8.33/seat/mo, Sonix at $25/mo. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it.

Does Otter.ai or Sonix have a free tier?

Otter.ai has a free tier; Sonix has paid plans only.

Which has a public API, Otter.ai or Sonix?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

All Otter.ai alternatives →Browse all Meeting Assistants →

From the blog