Skip to content
effecthub

Otter.ai vs PixScript

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
Otter.ai from $8.33/seat/mo, PixScript from $9/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Otter.ai has one; not confirmed by us for PixScript
Higher Trust score
Otter.ai — 94 vs 64 for PixScript
Best fit
Otter.ai: Teams that live in Zoom, Meet or Teams and want notes without a note-taker · PixScript: Content creators who need quick transcripts from social video links

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactOtter.aiPixScript
CategoryMeeting AssistantsSpeech-to-Text & Transcription
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$8.33/seat/mo$9/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score94 / 10064 / 100
PlatformsWeb, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, APIWeb, Chrome extension
CompanyOtter.ai—
Launched20162026
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Otter.ai

Still the default for English-language meeting notes, and the free tier is unusually usable. What determines the right plan is not features but the per-conversation ceiling: 30 minutes on Basic and 90 on Pro means a standard hour-long review truncates on the free tier and a workshop truncates on Pro. Pick the tier by your longest recurring meeting.

Pros

  • 300 free minutes a month makes evaluation real rather than token
  • Annual Pro at $8.33 is roughly half the month-to-month rate
  • An MCP server is exposed from the free tier, so assistants can query transcripts without the paid API
  • Business removes the minute cap entirely rather than raising it

Cons

  • The API and webhooks require Enterprise, which is quote-only
  • Per-conversation ceilings (30 min free, 90 min Pro) cut recordings mid-meeting
  • Basic allows three file imports in total, not per month
  • Month-to-month pricing is roughly double annual at both self-serve tiers

PixScript

PixScript covers the three platforms creators actually post to, YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram, rather than requiring a file upload workflow, and the dedicated YouTube extension shortens that further. The free tier's 5-minute clip limit will push anyone transcribing full-length videos toward the paid plan quickly.

Pros

  • Accepts direct links from YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram, not just file uploads
  • Chrome extension speeds up transcription from YouTube specifically
  • Subtitle export in SRT and VTT on the Pro tier
  • Translation into 50+ languages and 2-hour videos on Business at $19 a month

Cons

  • Free tier is capped at 5-minute clips and 30 minutes a month
  • Even Pro stops at 30-minute videos; full podcasts need Business
  • No company name or location disclosed

Which one fits

Choose Otter.ai if you need

  • Teams that live in Zoom, Meet or Teams and want notes without a note-taker
  • Accessibility use, where live captions matter as much as the transcript
  • Recruiters and researchers who need searchable interview records across a workspace

Choose PixScript if you need

  • Content creators who need quick transcripts from social video links
  • Podcasters and students who want timestamped, searchable transcripts
  • Users who want subtitle files, not just plain text

Otter.ai vs PixScript: the questions people ask

Is Otter.ai cheaper than PixScript?

They charge in different units, so there is no like-for-like answer: Otter.ai starts at $8.33/seat/mo, PixScript at $9/mo. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it.

Does Otter.ai or PixScript have a free tier?

Both: Otter.ai has a free tier, and PixScript has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Otter.ai or PixScript?

Otter.ai ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for PixScript is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Otter.ai alternatives →Browse all Meeting Assistants →

From the blog