Skip to content
effecthub

Make vs PUNKU.AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Make has one; not confirmed by us for PUNKU.AI
Higher Trust score
Make — 86 vs 79 for PUNKU.AI
Best fit
Make: Operations and marketing teams wiring SaaS apps together with branching logic they can see · PUNKU.AI: Businesses in tourism, energy, or industrial sectors wanting automation without hiring developers
Status
We could not check Make — its site turns automated checks away; PUNKU.AI was up on Oct 14, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactMakePUNKU.AI
CategoryWorkflow Automation PlatformsAI Workflow Builders
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score86 / 10079 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb
CompanyCelonis, Inc.PUNKU.AI
Launched—2023
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Oct 14, 2026

What our research says

Make

Make is the visual automation tool for people who outgrow Zapier's straight lines and want routers, iterators and error handling on a canvas without running their own n8n. The credit model is the thing to understand before committing: most steps cost one credit, AI steps cost more and purchased top-ups expire, so a chatty scenario can burn a month's allowance in days. The MCP server and agents make it a reasonable home for assistant-driven automations, but they draw from the same credit pool.

Pros

  • Branching, iteration and error handling on a visual canvas, with routers and error handlers free of credits
  • 3,000+ native apps plus custom integrations for any API
  • AI agents with goals, tools, limits and visible reasoning, plus an MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini
  • Free plan with 1,000 credits a month and SOC 2 Type II, SSO and audit logs on paid tiers

Cons

  • Plan prices are not readable without a browser session; the pricing page shows credits, not dollars, to fetchers
  • Credits expire at the end of the term and purchased extras expire sooner
  • AI-provider steps consume more than one credit, making agent-heavy scenarios hard to budget
  • No self-hosted option

PUNKU.AI

PUNKU targets industries like tourism and industrial services that are usually underserved by automation tools built for tech companies, and its 2,700-plus integration claim suggests real breadth of connectivity. Without published pricing, it's hard to know how the cost compares once the free credits run out.

Pros

  • Plain-English setup with no coding required
  • Claims over 2,700 integrations for connecting existing business tools
  • ISO 27001 and GDPR compliance claims support enterprise trust
  • Free credit balance to test before paying

Cons

  • No pricing is published anywhere on the public site
  • Verticals named (tourism, energy, industrial) are broad, so depth in any one sector is unproven from the site alone
  • One-time free credits, not a renewing free tier, so testing is time-limited

Which one fits

Choose Make if you need

  • Operations and marketing teams wiring SaaS apps together with branching logic they can see
  • Builders who want AI agents and automations in one place, driven from Claude or ChatGPT through MCP
  • Companies that need SSO, audit logs and SOC 2 on a no-code automation tool

Choose PUNKU.AI if you need

  • Businesses in tourism, energy, or industrial sectors wanting automation without hiring developers
  • Teams that want to test agent automation with a no-card-required free tier

Make vs PUNKU.AI: the questions people ask

Does Make or PUNKU.AI have a free tier?

Both: Make has a free tier, and PUNKU.AI has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Make or PUNKU.AI?

Make ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for PUNKU.AI is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Make alternatives →All PUNKU.AI alternatives →Browse all Workflow Automation Platforms →