Skip to content
effecthub

Lightscreen vs Metaview

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Metaview has one; Lightscreen prices on request
Higher Trust score
Metaview — 95 vs 79 for Lightscreen
Best fit
Lightscreen: Companies doing high-volume technical screening · Metaview: In-house recruiting teams on Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, Gem or SmartRecruiters
Status
Both up at our last check — Lightscreen Sep 1, 2026, Metaview Sep 6, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactLightscreenMetaview
CategoryAI Interviewers & AssessmentsAI Interviewers & Assessments
Pricing modelContactFreemium
Starts at—$100/seat/mo
Trust score79 / 10095 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb
CompanyLightscreen, Inc.Metaview Global Limited
Launched20242018
Last verifiedSep 1, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Lightscreen

Useful for teams that run enough technical interviews to justify handing the first round to an AI interviewer with cheating detection built in. Because pricing and terms are only available after a sales conversation, it is hard to judge cost-effectiveness against a plain ATS plus a scheduling tool until you actually talk to them.

Pros

  • Runs a full voice-and-video technical interview without a human on the call
  • Includes cheating detection during interviews
  • Plugs into existing ATS, background-check, and calendar tools instead of replacing them

Cons

  • No public pricing, so cost comparison requires a sales call
  • Candidates interact with an AI interviewer rather than a person, which will not suit every hiring brand
  • Young company founded in 2024 with a small team

Metaview

Metaview earned its reputation on interview notes that land in the scorecard rather than a transcript dump, and that still works. The company has since repositioned around recruiting agents, so the pricing page now leads with sourcing seats at $100 and $300 a month and the notetaker is one agent among several. Good for recruiting teams that want agents inside an ATS they already run; harder to evaluate if all you wanted was the notetaker, whose price is no longer the headline.

Pros

  • Notes map to the interview scorecard and sync to the ATS, which generic notetakers do not do
  • Modular pricing: one platform, pay only for the agents a user runs
  • Free sourcing tier with 100 profiles lets you test the agent before paying
  • Compliance posture is spelled out: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PIPEDA and an audit trail of agent reasoning

Cons

  • Notetaker and application-review prices are not visible on the pricing page we could render
  • Product surface has widened from notes to autonomous outreach, which some candidates and legal teams will object to
  • Two legal names (Metaview Labs Inc. in the footer, Metaview Global Limited in the terms) make the contracting entity unclear
  • Reports are an extra flat-fee add-on with no published figure

Which one fits

Choose Lightscreen if you need

  • Companies doing high-volume technical screening
  • Recruiting teams already using an ATS Lightscreen integrates with
  • Startups that want interview notes generated automatically

Choose Metaview if you need

  • In-house recruiting teams on Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, Gem or SmartRecruiters
  • Interviewers who want scorecard-ready notes without typing during the call
  • Talent teams piloting outbound sourcing agents with a free 100-profile allowance

Lightscreen vs Metaview: the questions people ask

Is Lightscreen cheaper than Metaview?

Metaview starts at $100/seat/mo; Lightscreen prices on request, so a quote is the only way to compare.

Does Lightscreen or Metaview have a free tier?

Metaview has a free tier; Lightscreen prices on request.

Browse all AI Interviewers & Assessments →