invideo
Verified Oct 16, 2026 ActiveTimeline video editor that scripts, voices and renders from a brief, with Veo, Kling, Seedance and other models on one credit meter.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Paid
- Paid options from
- $20/seat/mo
- Billing
- Per seat, monthly
Per seat, credits reset monthly and do not roll over: Starter 20 month-to-month or 10 per month billed annually for 400 credits (about 160 Nano Banana Pro images or 15 Seedance 2 Fast clips); Plus 60 or 30 annually for 2,000 credits plus 10 guest seats; Max 150 or 75 annually for 5,000 credits plus 20 guest seats, with larger Max tiers at 300 and 450. The page rendered in euros for our location; the figures above come from the page's own USD plan records, which carry the same numbers. No free plan is shown on the pricing page.
Use tool ↗About invideo
invideo has grown from a stock-footage assembler into what it calls an agentic editor: a multitrack timeline where a text brief becomes a script, scenes, voiceover and captions, and where generative models - Google Veo 3.1, Kling, Wan, Pixverse, Hailuo and Seedance for video, Nano Banana Pro and Ideogram for images, ElevenLabs and Minimax voices - are rendered against a per-seat credit allowance. It adds avatars, voice cloning, UGC-style ads, a library of premium stock clips and mobile apps, and lets an outside agent such as Claude or Codex drive edits on the timeline. Plans are per seat: Starter at 20 a month (10 billed annually) with 400 credits, Plus with 2,000 and Max with 5,000, and unused credits lapse monthly. The contracting entity is Invideo Innovation Pte. Ltd. in Singapore, with a Delaware company for North America and a Mumbai company for India.
- API
- Not confirmed
- Last verified
- Oct 16, 2026
Verified sources
- Per-seat plans Starter, Plus and Max with 400, 2,000 and 5,000 credits a month (about 160 Nano Banana Pro images or 15 Seedance 2 Fast clips on Starter); rendered as 20/60/150 monthly or 10/30/75 billed annually in euros, with the page's USD plan records listing Starter monthly at 20; unused credits do not roll over and credit costs may change without notice; 10 and 20 guest seats on Plus and Max; no free plan shown (15 October 2026)invideo.io ↗
- Positioned as an agentic multitrack editor with Veo 3.1, Kling, Wan, Pixverse, Hailuo and Seedance video models, Nano Banana Pro and Ideogram images, ElevenLabs and Minimax voices, avatars, UGC ads, premium stock, iOS and Android apps and bring-your-own-agent editing (15 October 2026)invideo.io ↗
- Terms updated 8 July 2026 name Invideo Innovation Pte. Ltd., Singapore, as the contracting entity for most users, Invideo Inc. (Delaware) for the US, Canada and Mexico, and Whitesheep Technology Private Limited (Mumbai) for India (15 October 2026)invideo.io ↗
Is invideo legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Google Trust Services, valid until Dec 15, 2026Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 16, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 16, 2026The site answered
- Operated by
- Invideo Innovation Pte. Ltd., SingaporeOur research, card verified Oct 15, 2026
Pros & cons of invideo
invideo's bet is that people want one subscription that bundles the frontier video models with a real editor, and for marketing teams churning out social clips that is a fair deal: a brief in, a cut with voice and captions out, and Veo or Kling scenes dropped in without opening four other accounts. The cost is that everything is credits, the model mix moves without notice, and a Starter seat's 400 credits is about fifteen short generative clips before the meter stops. Treat it as a production tool with a generative budget attached, not as unlimited AI video.
Pros
- Several third-party video and image models under one subscription, chosen per scene
- Brief-to-video flow produces script, scenes, voiceover and captions that can then be edited on a timeline
- Mobile apps and bring-your-own-agent editing from Claude, Codex, Grok or Gemini
- Premium stock clips and multiple voice engines included in the seat
Cons
- Credits lapse at the end of each month and the vendor reserves the right to change model credit costs at any time
- 400 credits on Starter is roughly 15 fast generative clips, so real generative work starts on Plus
- Prices render in local currency and the annual rate is the headline; the monthly price is double
- Three contracting entities across Singapore, Delaware and Mumbai, with no company page on the site
Best for
- Marketing and social teams producing short videos weekly who want stock, voice and generative scenes in one editor
- Creators who want Veo, Kling or Seedance output inside a timeline rather than a prompt box
- Teams that will use the guest seats to let clients review and comment
Not for
- Anyone expecting a free tier - the pricing page lists only paid seats
- Studios that need a fixed per-clip cost; credit prices per model can change without notice
Watch out: Credit costs per model are not fixed - the FAQ says they can change without prior notice - so a workflow built on one model's price today can cost more next month, and unused credits are gone at month end.
Alternatives to invideo
invideo head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.
- invideo vs Animoto
- invideo vs AriaFlow
- invideo vs CapCut
- invideo vs Clipbard
- invideo vs Fableclip
- invideo vs FlexClip
- invideo vs GoFaceless
- invideo vs Idea2Clip
- invideo vs Kineo
- invideo vs Lumen5
- invideo vs LyricEdits
- invideo vs Pictory
- invideo vs RuneContent
- invideo vs Runway
- invideo vs Synthesia
- invideo vs Tool.Video
- invideo vs VEED
- invideo vs VideoGen
- invideo vs VideoLlama
- invideo vs Vidon.ai
- invideo vs Virvid