Skip to content
effecthub

Fronty vs TeleportHQ

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Fronty — $8/mo vs $14/mo for TeleportHQ
Free plan
Only Fronty (TeleportHQ has paid plans only)
Public API
Fronty has one; not confirmed by us for TeleportHQ
Best fit
Fronty: Freelancers turning client mockup images into live sites quickly · TeleportHQ: Agencies producing many small marketing and content sites
Platforms
Fronty: Web · TeleportHQ: Web, Figma plugin

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

FrontyTurns a design screenshot into an HTML/CSS website with a no-code editor, database and managed hostingTeleportHQVisual front-end builder that exports working React, Vue, Angular or plain HTML from designs and prompts

Side by side

FactFrontyTeleportHQ
CategoryDesign-to-CodeWebsite Builders
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at$8/mo$14/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score94 / 10092 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, Figma plugin
CompanyFronty, Inc.TeleportHQ
Launched—2017
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

Fronty

A niche take on design-to-code: it starts from a flat image rather than a Figma file, which helps when a screenshot is all you have. Entry pricing is low at $8 a month, but image-based reconstruction is less precise than importing structured design files, so test output quality on the free plan first.

Pros

  • Accepts plain screenshots, not just structured design files
  • Hosting, domains and a visual editor come bundled
  • Documented public API for the conversion service
  • Free plan exists to test output quality

Cons

  • Monthly AI generation caps are tight on the free (3) and Starter (20) tiers
  • Generated static HTML/CSS suits sites, not application code

TeleportHQ

TeleportHQ still stands out from typical no-code builders on the thing developers care about: exportable framework code (React, Next.js, Vue, Angular) rather than a locked hosted site. The pricing has moved to Pro and Premium plans, export is now a paid-plan feature limited to static projects, and AI generation draws on metered monthly tokens.

Pros

  • Framework-aware code export (HTML, React, Next.js, Vue, Angular) limits lock-in
  • Figma-to-code plugin covers the design handoff
  • Entry price is low next to comparable builders
  • Hosting, forms, auth and a headless CMS are built in for publishing

Cons

  • Free usage is only a 7-day trial with code preview, not a permanent tier
  • Code export covers static projects only, not interactive web apps
  • AI generation is capped by monthly token allowances

Which one fits

Choose Fronty if you need

  • Freelancers turning client mockup images into live sites quickly
  • Small businesses that want a hosted site with light database features
  • Rebuilding a lost website from screenshots

Choose TeleportHQ if you need

  • Agencies producing many small marketing and content sites
  • Designers handing developers real components instead of static specs
  • Developers scaffolding front-ends they intend to finish by hand

Fronty vs TeleportHQ: the questions people ask

Is Fronty cheaper than TeleportHQ?

On published entry prices, Fronty starts lower — $8/mo against $14/mo for TeleportHQ. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Fronty or TeleportHQ have a free tier?

Fronty has a free tier; TeleportHQ has paid plans only.

Which has a public API, Fronty or TeleportHQ?

Fronty ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for TeleportHQ is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

More comparisons

Browse all Design-to-Code →