Skip to content
effecthub

Framer vs TeleportHQ

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
TeleportHQ — $9/mo vs $10/mo for Framer
Free plan
Only Framer (TeleportHQ has paid plans only)
Best fit
Framer: Designers shipping marketing sites and landing pages without a developer · TeleportHQ: Agencies producing many small marketing and content sites
Platforms
Framer: Web · TeleportHQ: Web, Figma plugin
Trust score
About even — Framer 94, TeleportHQ 92

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

FramerWebsite builder with generated layouts and copyTeleportHQVisual front-end builder that exports working React, Vue, Angular or plain HTML from designs and prompts

Side by side

FactFramerTeleportHQ
CategoryWebsite BuildersWebsite Builders
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at$10/mo$9/mo
Trust score94 / 10092 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, Figma plugin
CompanyFramer B.V.TeleportHQ
Launched—2017
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Framer

Framer is the builder to pick when the person shipping the site thinks in a design canvas and the site is a marketing surface — landing pages, portfolios, launch sites — rather than an application. Its AI is a layout and copy accelerator inside that canvas, not a site-in-a-click generator, and the honest cost is the seats: the $10 Basic headline becomes $30 the moment a second person needs edit rights.

Pros

  • Design canvas with real responsive breakpoints rather than fixed templates
  • Hosting, CMS, localisation and custom domain are included on paid site plans
  • AI credits come with every plan, including 500 to try on Free
  • Published pricing with no quote gate below Enterprise

Cons

  • Editor seats cost $20 each on top of the site plan
  • AI generation is metered in credits that need topping up on heavier use
  • CMS item and page caps (1,000 / 2,500 items) are tight for larger content sites
  • The pricing page shows one figure per plan under a yearly toggle, so the month-to-month price is not obvious

TeleportHQ

Stands out from typical no-code builders on the one thing developers care about: you can leave with usable framework code at any point, free of charge. AI generation draws on metered monthly tokens, and the quality of exported components still depends on how disciplined your design structure is.

Pros

  • Code export is free and framework-aware, which limits lock-in
  • Figma-to-code plugin covers the design handoff
  • Per-editor price is low next to comparable builders
  • Hosting, forms and headless CMS are built in for publishing

Cons

  • Free usage is only a 7-day watermarked trial, not a permanent tier
  • AI generation is capped by monthly token allowances
  • Advanced interactivity still needs hand-written code after export

Which one fits

Choose Framer if you need

  • Designers shipping marketing sites and landing pages without a developer
  • Startups that want hosting, CMS, localisation and a custom domain under one subscription
  • Teams prototyping in a canvas who want the prototype to become the live site

Choose TeleportHQ if you need

  • Agencies producing many small marketing and content sites
  • Designers handing developers real components instead of static specs
  • Developers scaffolding front-ends they intend to finish by hand

Framer vs TeleportHQ: the questions people ask

Is Framer cheaper than TeleportHQ?

On published entry prices, TeleportHQ starts lower — $9/mo against $10/mo for Framer. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Framer or TeleportHQ have a free tier?

Framer has a free tier; TeleportHQ has paid plans only.

More comparisons

Browse all Website Builders →