Skip to content
effecthub

Fronty vs IMG2HTML

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. IMG2HTML publishes a starting price ($1.99); Fronty does not. Only Fronty has a free tier. Both ship a public API.

FrontyTurns a design screenshot into an HTML/CSS website with a no-code editor, database and managed hostingIMG2HTMLTurns a screenshot into HTML and CSS, or a React, Vue or Angular component, at one credit per image.

Side by side

FactFrontyIMG2HTML
CategoryDesign-to-CodeDesign-to-Code
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at—$1.99 month
Public APIYesYes
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, Chrome Ext, API
CompanyFronty, Inc.TONVI TECH SL
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Fronty

A niche take on design-to-code: it starts from a flat image rather than a Figma file, which helps when a screenshot is all you have. Verify current prices and output quality yourself - the pricing table hides behind login, and image-based reconstruction is less precise than importing structured design files.

Pros

  • Accepts plain screenshots, not just structured design files
  • Hosting, domains and a visual editor come bundled
  • Documented public API for the conversion service
  • Free plan exists to test output quality

Cons

  • Pricing is not publicly readable, which complicates evaluation
  • Generated static HTML/CSS suits sites, not application code

IMG2HTML

IMG2HTML does one narrow job and prices it per image, which suits occasional conversions better than a flat subscription. Framework export and the in-browser editor make the output usable rather than a starting sketch, and it is one of few tools here with a named EU company behind it. The catch is that the cheap tiers are tiny — $1.99 buys three images — and the output still needs a developer's pass before it ships.

Pros

  • Exports HTML/CSS, Tailwind, React, Vue and Angular from the same image
  • OCR preserves text and styling instead of rasterising it
  • Chrome extension captures any on-screen region directly
  • API and browser editor cover batch work and post-conversion fixes

Cons

  • Cheapest paid tier is 3 credits, enough only to sample the output
  • Credits are consumed per image regardless of result quality
  • No permanent free tier, only a 3-day trial
  • Generated markup still needs a developer pass before shipping

Which one fits

Choose Fronty if you need

  • Freelancers turning client mockup images into live sites quickly
  • Small businesses that want a hosted site with light database features
  • Rebuilding a lost website from screenshots

Choose IMG2HTML if you need

  • developers rebuilding a page they only have a screenshot of
  • front-end work that starts from a static mockup rather than a Figma file
  • quick Tailwind or React scaffolds from a reference design

More comparisons

Browse all Design-to-Code →