Skip to content
effecthub

Fronty vs IMG2HTML

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
IMG2HTML — $1.99/mo vs $8/mo for Fronty
Free plan
Only Fronty (IMG2HTML has paid plans only)
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Fronty — 94 vs 86 for IMG2HTML
Best fit
Fronty: Freelancers turning client mockup images into live sites quickly · IMG2HTML: developers rebuilding a page they only have a screenshot of

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

FrontyTurns a design screenshot into an HTML/CSS website with a no-code editor, database and managed hostingIMG2HTMLTurns a screenshot into HTML and CSS, or a React, Vue or Angular component, at one credit per image.

Side by side

FactFrontyIMG2HTML
CategoryDesign-to-CodeDesign-to-Code
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at$8/mo$1.99/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score94 / 10086 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, Chrome extension, API
CompanyFronty, Inc.TONVI TECH SL
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Fronty

A niche take on design-to-code: it starts from a flat image rather than a Figma file, which helps when a screenshot is all you have. Entry pricing is low at $8 a month, but image-based reconstruction is less precise than importing structured design files, so test output quality on the free plan first.

Pros

  • Accepts plain screenshots, not just structured design files
  • Hosting, domains and a visual editor come bundled
  • Documented public API for the conversion service
  • Free plan exists to test output quality

Cons

  • Monthly AI generation caps are tight on the free (3) and Starter (20) tiers
  • Generated static HTML/CSS suits sites, not application code

IMG2HTML

IMG2HTML does one narrow job and prices it per image, which suits occasional conversions better than a flat subscription. Framework export and the in-browser editor make the output usable rather than a starting sketch, and it is one of few tools here with a named EU company behind it. The catch is that the cheap tiers are tiny — $1.99 buys three images — and the output still needs a developer's pass before it ships.

Pros

  • Exports HTML/CSS, Tailwind, React, Vue and Angular from the same image
  • OCR preserves text and styling instead of rasterising it
  • Chrome extension captures any on-screen region directly
  • API and browser editor cover batch work and post-conversion fixes

Cons

  • Cheapest paid tier is 3 credits, enough only to sample the output
  • Credits are consumed per image regardless of result quality
  • No permanent free tier, only a 3-day trial
  • Generated markup still needs a developer pass before shipping

Which one fits

Choose Fronty if you need

  • Freelancers turning client mockup images into live sites quickly
  • Small businesses that want a hosted site with light database features
  • Rebuilding a lost website from screenshots

Choose IMG2HTML if you need

  • developers rebuilding a page they only have a screenshot of
  • front-end work that starts from a static mockup rather than a Figma file
  • quick Tailwind or React scaffolds from a reference design

Fronty vs IMG2HTML: the questions people ask

Is Fronty cheaper than IMG2HTML?

On published entry prices, IMG2HTML starts lower — $1.99/mo against $8/mo for Fronty. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Fronty or IMG2HTML have a free tier?

Fronty has a free tier; IMG2HTML has paid plans only.

Which has a public API, Fronty or IMG2HTML?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

More comparisons

Browse all Design-to-Code →