Skip to content
effecthub

Exogram vs Mem0

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
The same for both — $19/mo
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Mem0 — 90 vs 82 for Exogram
Best fit
Exogram: People who use several AI assistants and want one shared memory between them · Mem0: Developers adding per-user memory to chatbots, support agents or assistants

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactExogramMem0
CategoryGuardrails & Content SafetyLLM Orchestration Frameworks
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$19/mo$19/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score82 / 10090 / 100
PlatformsWeb, Chrome extension, APIAPI, Web
CompanyExogram LLCEmbedchain, Inc. (d/b/a Mem0)
Launched—2024
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 2, 2026

What our research says

Exogram

Exogram has turned from an agent policy gate into a personal memory workspace: one vault of your context that several AI models and coding tools can draw on. It suits people who switch between ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini and are tired of re-explaining themselves. The pitch is heavy on jargon and self-reported speed figures, and it asks for very personal data, so judge it on the free tier first.

Pros

  • Free plan with unlimited bring-your-own-key use and no card
  • Imports existing memory exports from ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini
  • MCP server and browser extension bring the same memory into other tools
  • Full JSON and markdown export of the memory vault

Cons

  • Marketing pages still list older model versions such as Claude 3.7 and GPT-4o
  • Latency and capability claims are self-reported with no outside benchmark
  • Run by a single founder, so continuity of a vault holding personal data is a real question

Mem0

Mem0 is a reasonable way to add cross-session personalisation to an agent without designing your own memory store, and the open-source library means you can start locally and move to the hosted service later. The hosted tiers are priced by request counts, so chatty agents can burn through the small plans faster than the user counts suggest.

Pros

  • Open-source library under Apache-2.0 with a hosted platform for production
  • Free tier with unlimited end users
  • SDKs plus MCP, CLI and a gateway for common agent setups
  • Compliance posture is published, including SOC 2 Type I

Cons

  • Graph memory, advanced analytics and private Slack support only start at the $249 Pro tier
  • Free and Starter tiers allow few retrieval requests, 1,000 and 5,000 a month
  • Quality depends on what the extraction step decides to store, which you cannot fully control

Which one fits

Choose Exogram if you need

  • People who use several AI assistants and want one shared memory between them
  • Developers who want their personal context available in Cursor or Claude Desktop over MCP
  • Users with their own API keys who want a free tier that does not cap usage

Choose Mem0 if you need

  • Developers adding per-user memory to chatbots, support agents or assistants
  • Teams that want an open-source memory library with a hosted option
  • Agent builders who need memory exposed over MCP

Exogram vs Mem0: the questions people ask

Is Exogram cheaper than Mem0?

Both publish the same entry price, $19/mo. The difference is what each plan includes, which the fact table above sets side by side.

Does Exogram or Mem0 have a free tier?

Both: Exogram has a free tier, and Mem0 has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Exogram or Mem0?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

Browse all Guardrails & Content Safety →