Skip to content
effecthub

DecEptioner vs WriteHuman

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. DecEptioner starts at $10, WriteHuman at $12. Both have a free tier. Both ship a public API.

DecEptionerRewrites AI-generated text so it stops tripping Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality and similar detectorsWriteHumanRewrites AI-generated text to read as human and scores it against detector models

Side by side

FactDecEptionerWriteHuman
CategoryAI Detection & HumanizersAI Detection & Humanizers
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$10 month$12 month
Public APIYesYes
PlatformsWeb, Chrome Ext, APIWeb, Chrome Ext, iOS, Android, API
Company—WriteHuman
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

DecEptioner

A detector-evasion rewriter with an unusually plain pitch: it names the detectors it aims to beat and prices word volume in tiers from $10 a month. The free tier is enough to test whether the output survives your own detector. The real problems are not technical — the vendor is anonymous, detector evasion breaks most schools' academic-integrity rules, and every detector update can invalidate the whole product overnight.

Pros

  • Free tier of 1500 rewriter words needs no card and shows the output quality up front
  • Word allowances and per-request caps are stated plainly for every tier
  • Chrome extension in addition to the web app, with 30-day rewrite history on all plans
  • API access included on Premium and on any annual plan

Cons

  • No company, founder or country is named anywhere on the site
  • Detector evasion is a moving target — any detector update can reset the claim
  • API is withheld from monthly Basic and Standard subscribers
  • The free tier caps a single rewrite at 400 words, too short for most documents

WriteHuman

As humanizers go this one is unusually transparent about its own scoring, showing per-sentence detection probability instead of a single vague pass mark, and its surface area — extension, mobile apps, API, MCP — is wider than most rivals. The catch is what the tool is for: passing AI-detection checks breaches most academic integrity policies, and no vendor can guarantee any detector's verdict.

Pros

  • Sentence-level detection scores rather than a single opaque verdict
  • Chrome extension, iOS and Android apps, plus a documented API and MCP access
  • Free tier lets you judge output quality before paying
  • Annual billing cuts the effective monthly rate by roughly a third

Cons

  • Request counts and word caps are tight on the lower tiers
  • Detector outcomes are probabilistic and shift as detectors are retrained
  • Use is disallowed by most academic integrity policies

Which one fits

Choose DecEptioner if you need

  • Writers whose genuinely human drafts keep getting false-flagged by a detector
  • Testing how brittle a given AI detector actually is
  • Bulk rewriting where per-word cost matters more than style

Choose WriteHuman if you need

  • Editing machine drafts into prose that sounds less uniform
  • Non-native writers smoothing generated text across 40-plus languages
  • Developers who want rewriting inside their own pipeline via the API

More comparisons

All DecEptioner alternatives →All WriteHuman alternatives →Browse all AI Detection & Humanizers →