Skip to content
effecthub

BypassGPT.co vs WriteHuman

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
BypassGPT.co — $7.90/mo vs $12/mo for WriteHuman
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
WriteHuman has one; not confirmed by us for BypassGPT.co
Higher Trust score
WriteHuman — 90 vs 77 for BypassGPT.co
Best fit
BypassGPT.co: Writers smoothing the tone of AI drafts they are allowed to use · WriteHuman: Editing machine drafts into prose that sounds less uniform

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactBypassGPT.coWriteHuman
CategoryAI Detection & HumanizersAI Detection & Humanizers
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$7.90/mo$12/mo
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score77 / 10090 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, Chrome extension, iOS, Android, API
CompanyMira Muse LLCWriteHuman LLC
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

BypassGPT.co

BypassGPT.co is a single-purpose humanizer: paste generated text, pick a tone, get a rewrite meant to pass GPTZero-style detectors. The free box is only a 200-character taster, so real use means a subscription from $7.90 a month on yearly billing. Its whole pitch is evading detection, which is the wrong tool for anyone bound by academic or client rules on AI use.

Pros

  • Free 200-character test with no account
  • Tone selection and several languages
  • Entry plan under $10 a month, Ultra removes character caps

Cons

  • Free tier is too small for anything beyond a sample
  • No published quality benchmarks against current detectors
  • Operator is not named on the site, only a contact address on the domain

WriteHuman

As humanizers go this one is unusually transparent about its own scoring, showing per-sentence detection probability instead of a single vague pass mark, and its surface area — extension, mobile apps, API, MCP — is wider than most rivals. The catch is what the tool is for: passing AI-detection checks breaches most academic integrity policies, and no vendor can guarantee any detector's verdict.

Pros

  • Sentence-level detection scores rather than a single opaque verdict
  • Chrome extension, iOS and Android apps, plus a documented API and MCP access
  • Free tier lets you judge output quality before paying
  • Annual billing cuts the effective monthly rate by roughly a third

Cons

  • Request counts and word caps are tight on the lower tiers
  • Detector outcomes are probabilistic and shift as detectors are retrained
  • Use is disallowed by most academic integrity policies

Which one fits

Choose BypassGPT.co if you need

  • Writers smoothing the tone of AI drafts they are allowed to use
  • Comparing a cheap humanizer against pricier rivals such as Undetectable.ai

Choose WriteHuman if you need

  • Editing machine drafts into prose that sounds less uniform
  • Non-native writers smoothing generated text across 40-plus languages
  • Developers who want rewriting inside their own pipeline via the API

BypassGPT.co vs WriteHuman: the questions people ask

Is BypassGPT.co cheaper than WriteHuman?

On published entry prices, BypassGPT.co starts lower — $7.90/mo against $12/mo for WriteHuman. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does BypassGPT.co or WriteHuman have a free tier?

Both: BypassGPT.co has a free tier, and WriteHuman has a free tier.

Which has a public API, BypassGPT.co or WriteHuman?

WriteHuman ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for BypassGPT.co is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All WriteHuman alternatives →Browse all AI Detection & Humanizers →