Skip to content
effecthub

CoreStory vs Swimm

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
CoreStory has one; Swimm prices on request
Public API
CoreStory has one; not confirmed by us for Swimm
Higher Trust score
Swimm — 88 vs 82 for CoreStory
Best fit
CoreStory: Enterprises modernizing or maintaining legacy systems with sparse documentation · Swimm: Teams documenting a mainframe or legacy .NET/Java estate before a migration
Platforms
CoreStory: Web · Swimm: Web, VS Code extension

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactCoreStorySwimm
CategoryDocumentation GeneratorsDocumentation Generators
Pricing modelFreemiumContact
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score82 / 10088 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, VS Code extension
CompanyCoreStorySwimm
Launched—2019
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

CoreStory

CoreStory targets large, old codebases that no single engineer fully understands any more, and its MCP and API hook gives coding agents real architectural context instead of only the files in view. A free Discover tier now lets an individual developer ingest a codebase and try it, but the Pro tier and every price are behind a sales conversation, so budgeting for team use means talking to the vendor first.

Pros

  • Persistent model of architecture, workflows and business rules instead of per-session context
  • Exposes that context to AI coding agents through MCP and an API
  • Generates diagrams, technical user stories and API specs directly from source
  • Free-forever Discover tier to test on a real codebase

Cons

  • No public prices; CIU usage is hard to estimate before a sales conversation
  • Free tier limits exports and sharing of generated documentation
  • The site shows mixed signals, with a waitlist page for a free individual plan alongside a live free-start sign-up

Swimm

Swimm is the rare documentation tool that treats old code as the source of truth instead of asking humans to describe it. If you are staring at a COBOL or .NET estate nobody understands, the flow maps and extracted business rules are the useful part. The catch is that it is no longer a tool you can simply buy: it is a staged engagement with engineers attached, and the self-serve documentation product it was known for is not what the site sells today.

Pros

  • Deterministic static analysis backs the AI output, so traces come from the code rather than a guess
  • Produces diagrams and flow maps, not only prose
  • Covers mainframe and COBOL alongside .NET and Java
  • Work is broken into fixed-price stages you can stop after

Cons

  • No pricing published anywhere on the site
  • Repositioned away from the continuous-documentation product it was known for
  • Aimed at large estates, which makes it overkill for a normal repository

Which one fits

Choose CoreStory if you need

  • Enterprises modernizing or maintaining legacy systems with sparse documentation
  • Teams that want Claude Code, Copilot or similar agents to query shared architectural context over MCP
  • Architects and new hires ramping up on an unfamiliar codebase

Choose Swimm if you need

  • Teams documenting a mainframe or legacy .NET/Java estate before a migration
  • Architects who need job-flow and variable traces out of unfamiliar code
  • Enterprises that want non-engineers to read what the code actually does

CoreStory vs Swimm: the questions people ask

Does CoreStory or Swimm have a free tier?

CoreStory has a free tier; Swimm prices on request.

Which has a public API, CoreStory or Swimm?

CoreStory ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Swimm is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

Browse all Documentation Generators →