Skip to content
effecthub

Browser Use vs Notte

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Notte — $20/mo vs $29/mo for Browser Use
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Notte — 89 vs 82 for Browser Use
Best fit
Browser Use: Running web automation without maintaining your own browser infrastructure · Notte: Developers running many parallel browser agents in the cloud

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactBrowser UseNotte
CategoryBrowser Automation AgentsBrowser Automation Agents
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$29/mo$20/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score82 / 10089 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIAPI, Web
CompanyBrowser UseNotte Labs Inc.
Launched20242024
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Oct 2, 2026

What our research says

Browser Use

The open-source library made the category legible, and the hosted service is the practical way to run it at scale without babysitting Chromium instances. CDP compatibility means existing Playwright or Puppeteer code points at it with a config change. The economics are metered all the way down, so a plan price tells you very little about your real bill.

Pros

  • Open-source Python library underneath, so you are not locked into the hosted service
  • CDP-compatible endpoint works with existing Playwright, Puppeteer and Selenium code
  • Residential proxies across 195-plus countries and stealth handling built in
  • Session persistence, structured outputs, workflow replay and human oversight checkpoints
  • Free tier of 10 agent tasks a month for evaluation

Cons

  • Subscription price is a credit float, not included usage — real cost depends on browser-hours, proxy GB and model tokens
  • Proxy egress at $5/GB adds up quickly on media-heavy sites
  • Company founded only in 2024, so operational track record is short
  • Free tier's 3 concurrent sessions rules out any real throughput test

Notte

Notte is aimed at developers who need hosted browsers for agents and want identity, proxy and credential handling in the same place. It competes directly with other cloud-browser providers, so the deciding factors are session limits, price per credit and how well its agent mode handles your target sites.

Pros

  • Free account with $10 of non-expiring credits and no card required
  • Sessions, proxies, vaults, agent identities and functions in a single API
  • Works with common stacks: Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium and several LLM providers
  • Live view and session replays help debug agent runs

Cons

  • Monthly plan credits expire at the end of each cycle
  • Free plan caps sessions at 15 minutes and 5 concurrent browsers
  • Bring-your-own keys and proxies are only available from the Startup plan up

Which one fits

Choose Browser Use if you need

  • Running web automation without maintaining your own browser infrastructure
  • Teams already on Playwright, Puppeteer or Selenium via the CDP endpoint
  • Agent workflows needing session persistence, replay and human checkpoints

Choose Notte if you need

  • Developers running many parallel browser agents in the cloud
  • Teams that need agent logins, email and phone verification handled by the platform
  • Anyone already using Playwright or Puppeteer who wants hosted sessions

Browser Use vs Notte: the questions people ask

Is Browser Use cheaper than Notte?

On published entry prices, Notte starts lower — $20/mo against $29/mo for Browser Use. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Browser Use or Notte have a free tier?

Both: Browser Use has a free tier, and Notte has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Browser Use or Notte?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

Browse all Browser Automation Agents →