Skip to content
effecthub

Asana vs Quila

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Asana starts at $10.99, Quila at $7. Both have a free tier. Only Asana ships a public API.

Side by side

FactAsanaQuila
CategoryTask & Project ManagementTask & Project Management
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$10.99 month$7 month
Public APIYesNo
PlatformsWeb, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, API, Slack AppWeb
CompanyAsana, Inc.Remodeled AI, LLC
Launched2008
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 1, 2026

What our research says

Asana

Asana is a mature work-management system whose AI story is unusually concrete: agents are built from the same rules engine teams already use, and billed from an account-level credit pool instead of a per-seat AI surcharge. The catch is that the free tier is now effectively a two-person demo, so any real team lands on a paid plan immediately.

Pros

  • AI credits pool across the account rather than being sold per seat
  • No seat cap on paid plans, so adding collaborators does not force a tier jump
  • Well-documented public API plus native desktop, mobile and Slack clients
  • Portfolios, goals and reporting cover the layer above day-to-day tasks

Cons

  • Free plan is limited to two collaborating users
  • Portfolios, goals and advanced reporting sit behind the $24.99 tier
  • AI credit consumption per automation is not published, so budgeting is guesswork

Quila

Quila is a straightforward Kanban-and-tasks tool with an AI assistant layered on top, priced low enough ($7-19/month) to compete with free tiers of larger project managers rather than enterprise suites. It's one of several small AI apps from the same operator, which is a fine sign of a working shipping process but not evidence of long-term backing. The Free plan's one-project, one-member limit makes it mostly a trial rather than something a real team could run on.

Pros

  • AI assistant helps draft project plans and boards from a prompt
  • Starter and Pro tiers are priced well under most competing project tools
  • template library for recurring workflows
  • annual billing discount equivalent to four free months

Cons

  • Free plan's single-project, single-member limit is too small for real team use
  • no enterprise-grade features like SSO or audit trails mentioned
  • operated alongside several unrelated single-purpose AI apps by the same small company, which raises questions about long-term focus

Which one fits

Choose Asana if you need

  • Cross-functional teams coordinating work across many projects and owners
  • Ops people who want automations and intake agents without writing code
  • Organisations that need portfolios, goals and reporting above project level

Choose Quila if you need

  • small teams and solo users wanting light AI help drafting project plans
  • students and freelancers organizing personal projects

All Quila alternatives →Browse all Task & Project Management