Skip to content
effecthub

AI2SQL vs Text2SQL.ai

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
AI2SQL — 79 vs 71 for Text2SQL.ai
Best fit
AI2SQL: Non-engineers pulling ad-hoc numbers from a warehouse · Text2SQL.ai: querying an unfamiliar or inherited schema
Platforms
AI2SQL: Web, Windows, macOS · Text2SQL.ai: Web, macOS, Windows, Linux

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactAI2SQLText2SQL.ai
CategorySQL & Database AssistantsSQL & Database Assistants
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$9/mo—
Public APIYesYes
Trust score79 / 10071 / 100
PlatformsWeb, Windows, macOS, APIWeb, macOS, Windows, Linux, API
CompanyAI2SQL—
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

AI2SQL

Useful for analysts and product people who read SQL but do not write it fluently, especially against dialects they touch rarely, and the Pro plan's live read-only connection means you check the answer, not just the query. The October pricing is friendlier than before: database connections and the desktop app now sit on the $19 Pro plan, and a small free plan exists. If your team already pays for a coding assistant or a BI tool with a natural-language layer, this is a duplicate line item.

Pros

  • Ten dialects including Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift and MongoDB
  • Read-only enforcement at the gateway rather than trusting the model
  • Desktop connector reaches localhost and private-network databases
  • MCP server works from Claude, ChatGPT and Cursor on every plan
  • One-time lifetime option for people who dislike subscriptions

Cons

  • The $9 Start plan caps you at 100 queries a month and cannot connect your own database
  • Free plan is limited to 3 queries a day on a demo database
  • Trials require a card
  • Company ownership and location are not disclosed on the site

Text2SQL.ai

A cheap, narrow utility for analysts and backend devs who write occasional SQL against schemas they did not design. If your team already pays for a coding assistant or a warehouse-native copilot, you almost certainly have this feature already.

Pros

  • schema upload makes output usable against real column names instead of generically shaped
  • explain and optimise modes are as useful as generation itself for code review
  • desktop app on all three OSes keeps schemas off the vendor's servers
  • API is priced transparently per request rather than through opaque credits

Cons

  • the pricing page renders client-side and third-party listings disagree on the tiers, so verifying cost takes a support ticket
  • no company name, team page or jurisdiction anywhere on the site, which matters when you are uploading schemas
  • scope is narrow: it writes SQL, it does not run or manage your analytics
  • API is throttled to 100 requests a month before per-request charges kick in

Which one fits

Choose AI2SQL if you need

  • Non-engineers pulling ad-hoc numbers from a warehouse
  • Translating a query between dialects such as Postgres and BigQuery
  • Teams wiring AI agents to a database through a read-only, logged endpoint

Choose Text2SQL.ai if you need

  • querying an unfamiliar or inherited schema
  • explaining legacy SQL to non-engineers during review
  • people who prefer local execution over pasting production schemas into a chat window

AI2SQL vs Text2SQL.ai: the questions people ask

Is AI2SQL cheaper than Text2SQL.ai?

AI2SQL starts at $9/mo. Text2SQL.ai has a free tier; what its paid plans cost is not confirmed by us yet.

Does AI2SQL or Text2SQL.ai have a free tier?

Both: AI2SQL has a free tier, and Text2SQL.ai has a free tier.

Which has a public API, AI2SQL or Text2SQL.ai?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

Browse all SQL & Database Assistants →