Skip to content
effecthub

88Agents vs Voiceflow

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Public API
Both have one
Best fit
88Agents: Agencies deploying chatbots for multiple clients · Voiceflow: Enterprise CX teams automating support across chat and phone
Platforms
88Agents: Web, Slack app · Voiceflow: Web
Trust score
About even — 88Agents 81, Voiceflow 80
Status
Both up at our last check — 88Agents Oct 15, 2026, Voiceflow Oct 29, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

88AgentsAgency chatbot builder that deploys to a web widget, Slack, email or a REST API on your own OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini keys.VoiceflowPlatform for designing, testing and running AI customer-support agents across web chat, voice, phone and SMS.

Side by side

Fact88AgentsVoiceflow
CategoryCustom GPTs & Bot BuildersAI Support Chatbots
Pricing modelPaidContact
Starts at$22/mo—
Public APIYesYes
Trust score81 / 10080 / 100
PlatformsWeb, Slack app, APIWeb, API
CompanyTeleport Corp Pty LtdVoiceflow, Inc.
Launched—2018
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 29, 2026

What our research says

88Agents

88Agents is aimed at agencies and builders rather than a single company's support desk: the bring-your-own-model-key approach and multi-channel deployment make it flexible for reselling to clients. Plans scale by chatbot count and storage rather than by usage, so pricing can climb quickly for anyone running many small bots rather than a few large ones.

Pros

  • Deploys the same trained agent across web, Slack, email, WhatsApp, and SMS
  • Lets customers choose between OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini per agent instead of locking into one provider
  • Trains on documents, websites, databases, and video, not just text uploads

Cons

  • No free tier; entry plan starts at $22-29/month
  • Plan limits are based on chatbot count and storage rather than conversation volume, an awkward fit for one high-traffic bot
  • Bringing your own model keys means separate, uncapped LLM provider costs on top of the subscription

Voiceflow

Voiceflow fits CX and support teams, and the agencies serving them, who want fine control over an agent's logic, integrations and model choice, with real staging and evaluation before launch. A small shop that wants an out-of-the-box helpdesk bot at a posted price, or a team without anyone to design and maintain flows, will get there faster with Intercom Fin or Tidio.

Pros

  • Mixes LLM playbooks with deterministic workflows for predictable behaviour
  • Deploys to chat, voice, phone and SMS from one project
  • Model choice across providers, with fallback during outages
  • SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA-ready deployments

Cons

  • No published prices; business plans go through sales
  • Credit-based usage makes total cost hard to predict
  • Takes design effort to get good results, beyond a no-code quick start

Which one fits

Choose 88Agents if you need

  • Agencies deploying chatbots for multiple clients
  • Builders who want to choose between OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini per agent
  • Teams needing one agent reachable across several messaging channels

Choose Voiceflow if you need

  • Enterprise CX teams automating support across chat and phone
  • Agencies building and white-labeling agents for several clients
  • Engineering teams that need APIs, code steps and model choice

88Agents vs Voiceflow: the questions people ask

Is 88Agents cheaper than Voiceflow?

88Agents starts at $22/mo; Voiceflow prices on request, so a quote is the only way to compare.

Which has a public API, 88Agents or Voiceflow?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

More comparisons

All 88Agents alternatives →Browse all Custom GPTs & Bot Builders →