WebAnatomy
Verified Oct 15, 2026 ActiveScreenshots a landing page, scores it against 60 conversion criteria and returns annotated fixes ranked by impact.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Freemium
Prices are shown only in euros, so no USD figure is recorded: Free gives one analysis credit, a conversion score and three previews a month; Pro is €9 a month for 10 analysis credits plus the MCP and benchmark library in your AI agent. Competitive audits are separate plans at €39 and €99 a month with rolling credits, and an expert audit is €399 one-time.
Use tool ↗About WebAnatomy
WebAnatomy takes a URL, captures desktop and mobile screenshots, and runs a vision model over the layout to score the page from 0 to 100 against 60 criteria in eight categories. Output is an annotated screenshot marking specific problems plus a prioritised list of fixes tagged high, medium or low impact, benchmarked against a library of roughly 4,000 sections from 650-plus companies. Paid tiers also expose an MCP endpoint so the analysis can be pulled into an AI coding assistant. It was built in 2025 by Gabriel Amzallag, previously working on web growth at the French fintech Qonto, and is priced in euros.
- Platforms
- Web
- API
- Not confirmed
- Last verified
- Oct 15, 2026
Verified sources
- Analyzer page: Free (1 analysis credit + 3 previews a month) and Pro at 9€ per month with 10 credits and MCP access (15 October 2026)webanatomy.ai ↗
- Pricing page: competitive audit plans at €39 and €99 per month with credits that roll over, expert audit €399 one-time, Pro at €9 a month (15 October 2026)webanatomy.ai ↗
- Terms of service: operated by GABRIEL AMZALLAG SASU, registered in Paris (R.C.S. 989 851 951), governed by French law (15 October 2026)webanatomy.ai ↗
Is WebAnatomy legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- Domain registered
- May 13, 2026Registry record (RDAP), registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC, looked up Sep 12, 2026
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Let's Encrypt, valid until Dec 13, 2026Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 15, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 15, 2026The site answered
- On the market since
- 2025The vendor's own material, read by us
- Operated by
- Gabriel Amzallag SASU, FranceOur research, card verified Oct 15, 2026
Pros & cons of WebAnatomy
The annotated-screenshot output is the useful part: it points at the element causing the problem instead of handing back a generic checklist, and benchmarking against a real section library gives the score some grounding. It is a one-founder business priced accordingly — cheap, but with credits rather than unlimited runs, and no track record beyond 2025.
Pros
- Returns annotated desktop and mobile screenshots marking the specific failing elements
- Scores against 60 published criteria across eight categories with high/medium/low impact ranking
- Benchmarks against about 4,000 catalogued sections from 650+ companies
- MCP access on paid tiers pipes the analysis into AI coding tools
- Free tier runs a real analysis before you pay
Cons
- Credit-metered — 10 analyses a month at the entry tier
- Solo-founder business launched in 2025, with a short track record
- Heuristic scoring is opinion, not measured conversion lift; it cannot replace testing
- Priced in euros only
Best for
- Founders auditing their own landing page before paying for traffic
- Freelancers who need a defensible CRO opinion to show a client
- Developers who want page critique piped into an AI coding assistant via MCP
Not for
- Teams that need real A/B testing rather than a heuristic score
- Anyone auditing many pages a month on the entry tier
Watch out: The free tier is capped at three previews a month and only one full analysis credit, so evaluating several pages means paying immediately.
Alternatives to WebAnatomy
Also used for
AI tools by profession
Landing Pages & CRO is one of the jobs on this page: