Loading tool…
Screenshots a landing page, scores it against 60 conversion criteria and returns annotated fixes ranked by impact.
WebAnatomy takes a URL, captures desktop and mobile screenshots, and runs a vision model over the layout to score the page from 0 to 100 against 60 criteria in eight categories. Output is an annotated screenshot marking specific problems plus a prioritised list of fixes tagged high, medium or low impact, benchmarked against a library of roughly 4,000 sections from 650-plus companies. Paid tiers also expose an MCP endpoint so the analysis can be pulled into an AI coding assistant. It was built in 2025 by Gabriel Amzallag, previously working on web growth at the French fintech Qonto, and is priced in euros.
EUR 9/month (about $10) for 10 analysis credits plus MCP access; EUR 19/month for 50 credits. Free tier gives one analysis credit and a conversion score, capped at three previews a month.
Use tool ↗The annotated-screenshot output is the useful part: it points at the element causing the problem instead of handing back a generic checklist, and benchmarking against a real section library gives the score some grounding. It is a solo project priced accordingly — cheap, but with credits rather than unlimited runs, and no track record beyond 2025.
Watch out: The free tier is capped at three previews a month and only one full analysis credit, so evaluating several pages means paying immediately.
No reviews yet — be the first to review WebAnatomy.
Reviews are tied to your EffectHub account — one review per tool, so the rating for WebAnatomy reflects real users.
No questions yet — ask the first one about WebAnatomy.
Questions about WebAnatomy are tied to your EffectHub account, so answers can reach you and the section stays free of spam.