SHIELD
Verified Oct 16, 2026 ActiveDevice fingerprinting that survives reinstalls and factory resets, used to break up fraud rings.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Contact sales
No published pricing at any tier. The site offers only a demo booking, which in device intelligence means volume-based annual contracts negotiated per account.
Use tool ↗About SHIELD
SHIELD identifies the physical device behind a session and keeps that identity stable across reinstalls, factory resets and incognito browsing, which is what makes it useful against fraud rings that churn accounts faster than any account-level check can follow. Around that identifier sit real-time session monitoring, more than twenty risk signals and a policy engine teams tune per flow, plus a path to drop friction for devices already known good. SDKs cover web, Android, iOS, React Native and Unity, with server-side integration and alert streaming into downstream systems. The vendor is SHIELD AI Technologies Pte. Ltd. of Singapore; named customers include inDrive, Alibaba Group, Razer and OLX Group.
- API
- Yes
- Last verified
- Oct 16, 2026
Verified sources
- Device-first fraud detection, persistence across resets, 20+ signals, policy engine, SDK platform list and named customers.shield.com ↗
- No about or company page is served at this path; vendor identity comes from the site footer instead.shield.com ↗
Is SHIELD legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- Domain registered
- Jul 28, 1995 (31 years ago)Registry record (RDAP), registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC, looked up Sep 6, 2026
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Google Trust Services, valid until Nov 26, 2026Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 16, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 16, 2026The site answered
- Operated by
- SHIELD AI Technologies Pte. Ltd., SingaporeOur research, card verified Aug 23, 2026
Pros & cons of SHIELD
Serious infrastructure for platforms whose fraud problem is one operator running hundreds of accounts. Persisting device identity through factory resets is the hard part and it is the whole product; the risk engine on top is conventional. Customer names like inDrive and OLX say the scale claims are real. Expect an enterprise sale, SDK work in every client, and a privacy conversation with your legal team.
Pros
- Device identity persists through reinstalls, factory resets and incognito sessions
- SDK coverage spans web, Android, iOS, React Native and Unity plus server-side integration
- A policy engine lets risk rules be configured per flow instead of one global threshold
- Trusted devices can be waved through, so fraud controls do not tax good users
Cons
- No pricing published anywhere; the only path is a demo booking
- Persistent hardware-level identifiers invite scrutiny under GDPR-style regimes
- Integration is not trivial - every client platform needs its own SDK deployment
- Signal coverage and detection rates are vendor-stated with no public benchmark
Best for
- Ride-hailing, fintech and marketplace platforms fighting multi-account abuse
- Teams that need to trust a device across app reinstalls
- Products willing to embed SDKs on web, mobile and game clients
Not for
- Small businesses - there is no self-serve tier or published price
- Teams that cannot ship a client-side SDK into their apps
Watch out: An identifier designed to survive a factory reset is exactly the thing privacy regulators look at hardest; get consent and disclosure reviewed before rollout.