Skip to content
effecthub

ScienceOS vs scite

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
ScienceOS — $8/mo vs $12/mo for scite
Free plan
Only ScienceOS (scite has paid plans only)
Public API
scite has one; not confirmed by us for ScienceOS
Best fit
ScienceOS: Literature reviews where citation trails matter · scite: Checking whether a paper you plan to cite has been disputed in later literature
Platforms
ScienceOS: Web · scite: Web, Chrome extension

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactScienceOSscite
CategoryAcademic Search & Literature ReviewResearch & Citation Tools
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at$8/mo$12/mo
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score90 / 10090 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, Chrome extension, API
CompanyscienceOS UG (haftungsbeschraenkt)Research Solutions, Inc.
Launched—2018
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

ScienceOS

Priced well below the usual academic-AI tier and unusually specific about its corpus - 230M papers, 800M snippets, 2.4B reference pairs, refreshed weekly. EU-only storage and a no-training commitment make it easier to clear with a university's data office than most rivals. The free tier is limited enough that serious use means paying.

Pros

  • Answers carry cited sources against a stated 230-million-paper index
  • Citation networks make backward and forward reference tracing practical
  • Chat spans up to 4,000 PDFs, with 1,000-file bulk import on Team
  • EU-only servers and an explicit no-training-on-user-data statement
  • Cheapest paid tier is around EUR 7 a month, well under most competitors

Cons

  • Figure extraction from PDFs is paywalled - the free tier is text only
  • The best model is unlimited only on the Team tier at six seats or more
  • No API for integrating results into other workflows
  • Euro pricing means dollar buyers absorb exchange-rate movement

scite

The citation-classification dataset is the moat — no other research assistant tells you a paper has been contradicted 14 times. Use it to vet sources, not to discover them; Elicit and Consensus are better at the initial sweep.

Pros

  • Supporting/contrasting/mentioning classification is genuinely unique among research tools
  • Zotero plugin, browser extension and MCP server carry the data into existing workflows
  • Pro plan includes API access to papers, tallies, citations and Reference Check
  • Backed by a public company since the 2023 acquisition, so it is unlikely to disappear

Cons

  • Classification quality depends on full-text access; low-coverage publishers yield sparse tallies
  • No permanent free plan any more, only a 7-day trial that converts automatically
  • The Assistant is competent but not clearly better than dedicated research chat tools
  • API access now requires the Pro plan, not Basic

Which one fits

Choose ScienceOS if you need

  • Literature reviews where citation trails matter
  • Researchers who need EU data residency
  • Working across a large personal PDF library at once

Choose scite if you need

  • Checking whether a paper you plan to cite has been disputed in later literature
  • Systematic reviews where you must justify why a source was included or dropped
  • Auditing your own manuscript's reference list before journal submission

ScienceOS vs scite: the questions people ask

Is ScienceOS cheaper than scite?

On published entry prices, ScienceOS starts lower — $8/mo against $12/mo for scite. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does ScienceOS or scite have a free tier?

ScienceOS has a free tier; scite has paid plans only.

Which has a public API, ScienceOS or scite?

scite ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for ScienceOS is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All ScienceOS alternatives →All scite alternatives →Browse all Academic Search & Literature Review →