Skip to content
effecthub

AnswerThis vs scite

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
scite — $12/mo vs $35/mo for AnswerThis
Free plan
Only AnswerThis (scite has paid plans only)
Public API
scite has one; not confirmed by us for AnswerThis
Higher Trust score
scite — 90 vs 79 for AnswerThis
Best fit
AnswerThis: Researchers running systematic or scoping reviews with a documented method · scite: Checking whether a paper you plan to cite has been disputed in later literature

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactAnswerThisscite
CategoryAcademic Search & Literature ReviewResearch & Citation Tools
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at$35/mo$12/mo
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score79 / 10090 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, Chrome extension, API
CompanyAnswerThisResearch Solutions, Inc.
Launched—2018
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

AnswerThis

AnswerThis goes further into the actual review process than most cited-answer tools — dual-reviewer screening, evidence grading and PRISMA structure are real workflow features, not chat wrappers. The catch is price: $35 a seat is well above general research assistants, and the free tier's five-project cap makes a serious evaluation awkward.

Pros

  • Screening, evidence grading and drafting sit in one workflow
  • Free plan needs no card and still includes cited search and exports
  • Exports into standard reference managers and thousands of citation styles
  • Institutional tier covers SSO and LMS integration rather than just more seats

Cons

  • Corpus size is stated inconsistently: 300M+ papers on the homepage, 250M+ on the pricing page
  • Team tier requires three seats billed annually, so the real entry cost is much higher
  • No API for pulling results into other tools

scite

The citation-classification dataset is the moat — no other research assistant tells you a paper has been contradicted 14 times. Use it to vet sources, not to discover them; Elicit and Consensus are better at the initial sweep.

Pros

  • Supporting/contrasting/mentioning classification is genuinely unique among research tools
  • Zotero plugin, browser extension and MCP server carry the data into existing workflows
  • Pro plan includes API access to papers, tallies, citations and Reference Check
  • Backed by a public company since the 2023 acquisition, so it is unlikely to disappear

Cons

  • Classification quality depends on full-text access; low-coverage publishers yield sparse tallies
  • No permanent free plan any more, only a 7-day trial that converts automatically
  • The Assistant is competent but not clearly better than dedicated research chat tools
  • API access now requires the Pro plan, not Basic

Which one fits

Choose AnswerThis if you need

  • Researchers running systematic or scoping reviews with a documented method
  • Pharma and clinical teams needing traceable evidence tables
  • Labs that want shared projects and dual-reviewer screening

Choose scite if you need

  • Checking whether a paper you plan to cite has been disputed in later literature
  • Systematic reviews where you must justify why a source was included or dropped
  • Auditing your own manuscript's reference list before journal submission

AnswerThis vs scite: the questions people ask

Is AnswerThis cheaper than scite?

On published entry prices, scite starts lower — $12/mo against $35/mo for AnswerThis. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does AnswerThis or scite have a free tier?

AnswerThis has a free tier; scite has paid plans only.

Which has a public API, AnswerThis or scite?

scite ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for AnswerThis is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All AnswerThis alternatives →All scite alternatives →Browse all Academic Search & Literature Review →