plori
Verified Oct 15, 2026 ActiveGives each AI coding agent its own persistent cloud computer — disk, shell, and network — reachable via MCP from Claude Code or Cursor.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Freemium
- Paid options from
- $20/mo
- Billing
- Monthly
Free tier includes $5 of monthly usage credit and 1 GB storage; Pro is $20/month ($20 credit, 20 GB); Power is $100/month ($120 credit, 50 GB). Extra storage is $0.10/GB/month.
Use tool ↗About plori
plori provisions a persistent cloud environment for AI agents — its own disk, shell access, and network connectivity — that a coding agent like Claude Code or Cursor can connect to over MCP with a single command. Because the environment persists, a long-running task such as a test suite or migration keeps running after the user disconnects, and the agent can install whatever software the task needs. It's aimed at developers who want dedicated, persistent workspaces for agents rather than a throwaway sandbox that resets between sessions. The free plan includes 1 GB of storage and $5 of monthly usage credit; paid plans start at $20/month for the Pro tier. No company name or location is published on the site.
- Platforms
- Web · API
- API
- Yes
- Last verified
- Oct 15, 2026
Verified sources
- Product description, features, and full pricing tableplori.ai ↗
- Confirms MCP-based cloud agent positioningmcpmarket.com ↗
Is plori legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- Domain registered
- May 1, 2026Registry record (RDAP), registrar Cloudflare, Inc, looked up Sep 17, 2026
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Google Trust Services, valid until Jan 8, 2027Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 15, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 15, 2026The site answered
- Operated by
- ploriOur research, card verified Sep 1, 2026
Pros & cons of plori
plori solves a specific problem for people running coding agents: a sandbox that resets on disconnect can't run a long test suite or migration unattended, so plori gives the agent a persistent machine instead. It's a straightforward infrastructure play with clear usage-based pricing, though it competes directly with several better-funded dev-sandbox platforms.
Pros
- Environments persist across sessions instead of resetting
- Connects over MCP to existing tools like Claude Code and Cursor with one command
- Usage-based pricing with a free tier for initial testing
- Supports scheduled and webhook-triggered recurring workflows
Cons
- No company name or location is disclosed, making it hard to vet who operates the infrastructure
- Competes with several more established agent-sandbox and dev-environment platforms
- Credit-based billing requires monitoring usage to avoid surprise costs at scale
Best for
- Developers running long test suites, migrations, or scheduled jobs through a coding agent
- Teams that want an agent workspace reachable from multiple MCP clients
Not for
- Users who only need short, interactive coding-agent sessions that a throwaway sandbox already handles
- Teams needing GPU-heavy compute rather than general-purpose disk and shell access
Alternatives to plori
plori head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.