PlagiarismCheck.org
The selling point is that one submission answers both questions a teacher has — was this copied, and was this generated — instead of running two services. Ten years of operation and real LMS plugins put it ahead of the many single-page detectors that appeared in 2023. Treat the accuracy claim with the scepticism every AI detector deserves: the underlying signals are statistical and non-native writers get flagged disproportionately across this whole category.
Pros
- Plagiarism and AI detection run on a single upload rather than two separate tools
- Sentence-level output shows which passages triggered the score, not just a document percentage
- Genuine LMS integrations across seven platforms, plus a Google Docs add-on and Chrome extension
- OCR handles scanned or photographed submissions
- Documented API for business use
Cons
- The published '99% accuracy' figure is the vendor's own and is not independently verified
- Institutional pricing is quote-only; the pricing page shows no numbers at all
- No company jurisdiction is disclosed, which matters for student-data processing
- AI detectors as a class produce false positives on formulaic and non-native writing