Skip to content
effecthub

Monica vs Poe

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Poe — 90 vs 80 for Monica
Best fit
Monica: People who compare answers across GPT, Claude and Gemini without paying three subscriptions · Poe: People who want several vendors' models under one login and one bill
Platforms
Monica: Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, Chrome extension · Poe: Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactMonicaPoe
CategoryBrowser Extensions & CopilotsMulti-model Chat Aggregators
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Public APIYesYes
Trust score80 / 10090 / 100
PlatformsWeb, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, API, Chrome extensionWeb, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, API
CompanyButterfly Effect Pte. Ltd.Quora
Launched2023—
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Monica

Worth it if you want one subscription that reaches GPT, Claude and Gemini from wherever you already are; pointless if you live inside a single vendor's app and are happy there. The value is the sidebar and the model switching, not the intelligence, which is all rented.

Pros

  • Genuinely wide model roster, including image and video models, under one credit pool
  • Extension plus desktop plus iOS/Android means the same history follows you across devices
  • Separate prepaid developer API at platform.monica.im if you want the same aggregation in code

Cons

  • Prices are only visible after loading the pricing app, and the tier names have already shifted once (Unlimited became Max)
  • Advanced credits reset monthly, so heavy image or video use burns a Pro plan fast
  • You are a reseller's customer — outages, rate limits and model deprecations arrive second-hand
  • monica.cn is a separate China-market build run by a different legal entity, which confuses support and privacy expectations

Poe

Poe makes sense if you want to compare frontier models side by side without paying each vendor, and the custom-bot layer is a cheap way to publish a prompt as a product. The catch is the points meter: one subscription buys wildly different quantities of use depending on which bot you pick, and per-bot costs are Poe's to change, so the plan you buy is not necessarily the plan you keep.

Pros

  • One subscription spans models from several vendors plus image and video generators
  • Custom bots can be built from a prompt and shared or monetised
  • Apps on web, iOS, Android, Mac and Windows
  • A creator API exists for developers

Cons

  • Points pricing makes real capacity hard to predict across models
  • Per-bot point costs and allowances are set by Poe and change over time
  • The home page blocks automated access and the subscription page shows regional prices, so USD figures could not be confirmed from the vendor
  • No team or enterprise tier is visible

Which one fits

Choose Monica if you need

  • People who compare answers across GPT, Claude and Gemini without paying three subscriptions
  • Reading and summarising foreign-language pages and PDFs in-place while browsing
  • Light users who want AI attached to the browser rather than in another tab

Choose Poe if you need

  • People who want several vendors' models under one login and one bill
  • Creators publishing custom bots without hosting anything
  • Comparing model answers side by side before committing to one vendor

Monica vs Poe: the questions people ask

Does Monica or Poe have a free tier?

Both: Monica has a free tier, and Poe has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Monica or Poe?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

All Monica alternatives →All Poe alternatives →Browse all Browser Extensions & Copilots →