Skip to content
effecthub

Literfy vs scite

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Literfy starts at $19, scite at $20. Both have a free tier. Only scite ships a public API.

LiterfySearches Google Scholar, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar at once and drafts a literature review grounded in the papers it finds.sciteCitation index that shows whether papers support or contradict

Side by side

FactLiterfyscite
CategoryAcademic Search & Literature ReviewResearch & Citation Tools
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$19 one_time$20 month
Public APINoYes
PlatformsWebWeb, Chrome Ext, API
CompanyLiterfyResearch Solutions, Inc.
Launched—2018
Last verifiedSep 1, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Literfy

Literfy's pitch — grounding every sentence of a generated review in an actual retrieved paper — targets the real failure mode of AI writing tools in academic contexts, which is confident-sounding citations to papers that don't say what the tool claims. Whether it fully avoids that failure mode isn't something that can be verified without testing it against a review the researcher already knows well.

Pros

  • Searches three major academic databases in one query instead of separately
  • Citation export in BibTeX/RIS plus direct sync to Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote
  • One-time credit pack option for a single project instead of forcing a subscription
  • Free tier lets a user test output quality before paying

Cons

  • Company's legal name and country aren't disclosed on the site
  • Like any AI summarization tool, grounding claims still need a researcher's own verification against the source papers

scite

The citation-classification dataset is the moat — no other research assistant tells you a paper has been contradicted 14 times. Use it to vet sources, not to discover them; Elicit and Consensus are better at the initial sweep.

Pros

  • Supporting/contrasting/mentioning classification is genuinely unique among research tools
  • Zotero plugin and free browser extension carry the data into existing workflows without an account
  • Full API access to papers, tallies, citations and Reference Check endpoints
  • Backed by a public company since the 2023 acquisition, so it is unlikely to disappear

Cons

  • Classification quality depends on full-text access; low-coverage publishers yield sparse tallies
  • $20/mo monthly is a hard sell against free-tier competitors unless you cite heavily
  • The Assistant is competent but not clearly better than dedicated research chat tools
  • Free tier is capped at roughly 100 reports a month

Which one fits

Choose Literfy if you need

  • Graduate students and PhD candidates drafting a first-pass literature review
  • Researchers wanting one search across Google Scholar, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar instead of three separate searches

Choose scite if you need

  • Checking whether a paper you plan to cite has been disputed in later literature
  • Systematic reviews where you must justify why a source was included or dropped
  • Auditing your own manuscript's reference list before journal submission
  • Librarians and institutions wanting citation-context badges inside existing discovery tools

More comparisons

All Literfy alternatives →All scite alternatives →Browse all Academic Search & Literature Review →