Skip to content
effecthub

Jamy vs tl;dv

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Best fit
Jamy: Distributed teams running calls across languages · tl;dv: Sales teams that need call outcomes landing in the CRM without manual entry
Platforms
Jamy: Web · tl;dv: Web, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows
Trust score
About even — Jamy 85, tl;dv 82

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

JamyMeeting bot that joins Zoom, Meet or Teams and returns a labelled transcript, summary and action itemstl;dvMeeting recorder that clips moments and syncs to CRM

Side by side

FactJamytl;dv
CategoryMeeting AssistantsMeeting Assistants
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$14.99/mo—
Public APIYesYes
Trust score85 / 10082 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows, API
CompanyJamy.aitldx Solutions GmbH
Launched—2020
Last verifiedOct 22, 2026Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

Jamy

The live-translation minutes are what separate this from the crowded meeting-notes field — it is aimed at calls where not everyone shares a language. The free tier is generous enough to test properly. The cost of that focus is that translation is metered separately from transcription until you reach the top plan.

Pros

  • Joins Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams directly
  • Transcription with speaker labels across more than 100 languages
  • Free tier includes 300 transcription minutes a month
  • API keys and webhooks are available on the $29.99 plan

Cons

  • Live translation is metered separately and only uncapped on the top tier
  • The site never names an operating company or country, and the privacy notice does not either
  • API access is gated to the most expensive plan

tl;dv

tl;dv earns its place when the recording has to end up somewhere else, in a CRM field or a shared clip, rather than sitting in an archive nobody reads. As a pure note-taker it is unremarkable.

Pros

  • Clip-and-share is faster in practice than pointing colleagues at a timestamp
  • CRM sync is a first-class feature rather than a Zapier afterthought
  • Free tier is a real plan, not a trial
  • Desktop apps and an extension cover the three major conferencing platforms

Cons

  • Billing is euro-only, which creates FX exposure for non-EU buyers
  • The API is v1alpha1 and explicitly unstable
  • Free plan cannot retrieve meeting content through the API at all
  • The 40% annual discount is permanent marketing, so the monthly rate is the real price

Which one fits

Choose Jamy if you need

  • Distributed teams running calls across languages
  • People who want notes pushed straight into Slack, a CRM or a task board
  • Anyone who needs a usable free tier before committing

Choose tl;dv if you need

  • Sales teams that need call outcomes landing in the CRM without manual entry
  • Distributed teams sharing a 90-second clip instead of a 45-minute recording
  • Researchers and PMs tagging moments across many user interviews

Jamy vs tl;dv: the questions people ask

Is Jamy cheaper than tl;dv?

Jamy starts at $14.99/mo. tl;dv has a free tier; what its paid plans cost is not confirmed by us yet.

Does Jamy or tl;dv have a free tier?

Both: Jamy has a free tier, and tl;dv has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Jamy or tl;dv?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

More comparisons

All Jamy alternatives →All tl;dv alternatives →Browse all Meeting Assistants →