Skip to content
effecthub

genei vs Long Summary

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Only Long Summary (genei has paid plans only)
Public API
Long Summary has one; not confirmed by us for genei
Higher Trust score
Long Summary — 79 vs 73 for genei
Best fit
genei: Students on the discounted academic tier doing literature triage · Long Summary: Condensing long reports without dropping detail
Platforms
genei: Web, Chrome extension · Long Summary: Web

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactgeneiLong Summary
CategoryPaper Reading & SummarizationSummarization
Pricing modelPaidFreemium
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score73 / 10079 / 100
PlatformsWeb, Chrome extensionWeb, API
CompanyGenei LtdMB Skydis
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

genei

The app still loads and still takes payment, but the marketing site has not been republished since January 2024 and it is still selling GPT-3 as a headline feature - the team's attention clearly moved to their sister product CoLoop. Only worth a look if the GBP academic tier undercuts everything else for you; otherwise Elicit, SciSpace or NotebookLM are actively maintained and free to start.

Pros

  • Academic pricing starts well below most research assistants
  • Project structure with annotations and reference export is well suited to writing up
  • Cross-document question answering rather than one-PDF-at-a-time
  • Browser extension captures sources without leaving the page

Cons

  • Site content and copyright notice are years stale, and GPT-3 is still the advertised model
  • No free tier, only a trial that requires a card
  • No API and no mobile app
  • Priced in GBP, so USD buyers absorb the exchange rate

Long Summary

Every other summarizer optimises for brevity; this one lets you dictate the output length, which is the correct tool when you need a twenty-page digest of a report rather than five bullets. The API framing as a substitute for retrieval — summarise the corpus, then feed the summary as context — is a genuinely useful pattern. The problem is commercial opacity: no plan table exists anywhere on the public site.

Pros

  • Output length is a parameter you set, not a fixed style
  • Handles file uploads and inputs described as millions of characters
  • Public developer API for automating the whole thing
  • Named legal operator with terms and a stated deletion-after-processing policy

Cons

  • No public pricing at all — /pricing 404s and /plans renders nothing
  • Long output means long generation time and higher token cost per run
  • One of several thin sites from the same operator, which raises maintenance questions

Which one fits

Choose genei if you need

  • Students on the discounted academic tier doing literature triage
  • Anyone who wants summaries plus auto-generated references in one place
  • Reading-heavy workflows where a browser extension to capture sources matters

Choose Long Summary if you need

  • Condensing long reports without dropping detail
  • Developers wanting summarised context instead of a RAG pipeline
  • Legal and academic reading where nuance matters more than brevity

genei vs Long Summary: the questions people ask

Does genei or Long Summary have a free tier?

Long Summary has a free tier; genei has paid plans only.

Which has a public API, genei or Long Summary?

Long Summary ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for genei is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All genei alternatives →Browse all Paper Reading & Summarization →