Driver
Verified Oct 15, 2026 ActiveCompiles a codebase into architecture docs, symbol tables, and dependency maps that AI coding agents query over MCP or an API.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Contact sales
No public price on the pricing page: the platform fee is sized by source lines of code analyzed per year (Team 5M-25M, Organization 25M-50M, Enterprise 50M+) and quoted by sales after a pilot; LLM tokens are billed separately at market rate, with no per-seat fees.
Use tool ↗About Driver
Driver analyzes a codebase ahead of time and produces structured context — architecture documentation, a symbol table, and dependency tracking — that AI coding agents can query instead of re-reading raw source on every request. Teams reach it through an MCP server compatible with Claude Code and Cursor, or through a REST API with machine-to-machine authentication. It supports multiple repositories and branches and targets engineering, support, and QA teams running AI agents at a scale where ad hoc prompting into a codebase stops working. Pricing is usage-tiered by lines of code analyzed per year and is not self-serve; you have to talk to sales to get a quote.
- Platforms
- Web · API
- API
- Yes
- Last verified
- Oct 15, 2026
Verified sources
- Pricing page: Team, Organization and Enterprise plans sized by SLOC analyzed per year, all Contact Sales; LLM tokens billed at market rate separately; no per-seat or per-agent metering (15 October 2026)driver.ai ↗
- Terms of Use: operated by Driver AI, Inc., registered in Delaware, USA, office in Austin, Texas (15 October 2026)driver.ai ↗
- Home page: MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor and other MCP clients, M2M authentication and REST API (15 October 2026)driver.ai ↗
Is Driver legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- Domain registered
- Dec 16, 2017 (8 years ago)Registry record (RDAP), registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC, looked up Sep 14, 2026
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Let's Encrypt, valid until Jan 11, 2027Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 15, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 15, 2026The site answered
- Operated by
- Driver AI, Inc., United StatesOur research, card verified Oct 15, 2026
Pros & cons of Driver
Driver is infrastructure for AI coding agents rather than a tool developers use directly: it pre-compiles a codebase into documentation and context an agent can query over MCP or API. That can make agents faster and more accurate on large codebases, but there's no visible self-serve price, and the entry tier already assumes millions of lines of code per year.
Pros
- exposes codebase context through an MCP server that plugs into Claude Code and Cursor
- offers a REST API with machine-to-machine authentication for custom integrations
- tracks context across multiple repositories and git branches
- works across any programming language rather than a fixed list
Cons
- no published self-serve pricing — the entry tier requires a sales conversation
- LLM token usage is billed separately from the platform fee, so total cost is unpredictable upfront
Best for
- engineering teams running Claude Code, Cursor, or similar agents against large codebases
- support and QA teams that need programmatic answers about a codebase
- organizations needing multi-repo, multi-branch context in one place
Not for
- solo developers or small repos below the entry SLOC tier
- teams wanting a fixed, published subscription price
Watch out: The lowest published tier starts at 5 million lines of code analyzed per year, so it is built for teams above a certain codebase size rather than individual projects.
Alternatives to Driver
Driver head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.