Skip to content
effecthub

Conveo vs Convo

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Convo publishes a starting price ($250); Conveo does not. Only Conveo ships a public API.

ConveoAI moderator runs video interviews with real consumers and compounds them into a queryable insight layer.ConvoRuns moderated user interviews on its own, transcribes them, and pulls the themes out across the whole study.

Side by side

FactConveoConvo
CategoryMarket & Competitive ResearchMarket & Competitive Research
Pricing modelContactPaid
Starts at—$250 month
Public APIYesNo
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb
CompanyConveoConvo
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Conveo

The interesting claim is not faster interviews, it is that interviews stop being one-off deliverables — every study adds to something the rest of the business can query. If your insights team's real problem is that last year's research is unfindable, that is the pitch. It is an enterprise purchase with security certifications and no published price.

Pros

  • AI moderator probes in real time rather than reading a fixed script
  • Facial coding and screen sharing extend it to usability work
  • Studies compound into a knowledge layer the organisation can question later
  • ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 2, GDPR, SSO and granular access controls
  • Open platform with MCP and API access, plus connections to retail and CRM data

Cons

  • No pricing anywhere and no self-serve tier
  • Company country and legal entity are not published on the site
  • Respondent recruitment terms are not spelled out publicly
  • An AI moderator will not chase the unexpected tangent a skilled human would

Convo

An AI-moderated research platform that runs the interview itself and does the transcription and theming afterwards, in over forty languages. Mobile ethnography and Figma prototype testing are covered, which is more than most survey tools attempt. The pricing is honest but expensive once you count minutes, and an automated moderator will not chase the interesting tangent a good researcher would.

Pros

  • The model moderates live and asks branching follow-ups rather than reading a fixed script
  • Handles concept testing, usability, discovery and diary studies including mobile ethnography
  • Transcribes, themes and produces shareable highlight reels automatically
  • Supports more than forty languages and integrates with Figma prototypes

Cons

  • The $250 monthly fee is only a floor; interview minutes and uploads are metered on top
  • No API is offered, so results stay inside the dashboard
  • An automated moderator misses the unscripted probe that often produces the real insight
  • Named customers are enterprise, and the pricing reflects that audience

Which one fits

Choose Conveo if you need

  • Insights teams running continuous brand or category tracking
  • Replacing focus groups and in-depth interviews at scale
  • Organisations that want past research to stay queryable

Choose Convo if you need

  • research teams running concept tests or usability studies at volume
  • multilingual studies where recruiting local moderators is the bottleneck
  • product teams testing Figma prototypes with real users

Browse all Market & Competitive Research →