Skip to content
effecthub

Consensus vs Scholarcy

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Both have a free tier. Only Scholarcy ships a public API.

ConsensusSearch over peer-reviewed papers with claim summariesScholarcyBreaks research papers into summary flashcards with extracted references

Side by side

FactConsensusScholarcy
CategoryAcademic Search & Literature ReviewPaper Reading & Summarization
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Public APINoYes
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, Chrome Ext, API
CompanyConsensusTexthelp
Launched20212018
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Consensus

Useful when you want to know what a body of literature actually concludes rather than reading one paper at a time, but it orients you, it does not replace reading them.

Pros

  • Every answer is tied to specific papers with study design and sample size
  • Free tier is a standing plan rather than a time-limited trial
  • The yes-or-no consensus meter is a fast orientation device
  • Covers a very large index of peer-reviewed literature

Cons

  • Summaries can flatten real disagreement between studies into false consensus
  • Coverage skews to indexed English-language biomedical work
  • Pricing cannot be verified from outside; the site blocks automated access
  • Free allowance of the deeper analyses runs out quickly in real use

Scholarcy

The strongest option when you need a consistent structured breakdown of a specific paper you already have. It is a summariser, not a discovery engine, so it does not replace Elicit or Consensus for finding what to read.

Pros

  • Flashcard structure (claims, methods, limitations) is consistent enough to compare papers side by side
  • Citation links resolve to open-access copies, saving a separate hunt
  • Exports to Word, Excel and reference managers rather than trapping output in the app

Cons

  • Extraction quality drops on badly formatted or scanned PDFs
  • Free tier's roughly 10 summaries a month runs out within one review session
  • Site is behind aggressive bot protection, which makes automated or scripted use awkward

Which one fits

Choose Consensus if you need

  • Checking whether a specific claim has support across published studies
  • Clinicians and students orienting quickly in an unfamiliar literature
  • Anyone who wants citations attached to every summarised claim

Choose Scholarcy if you need

  • Postgraduates screening a pile of PDFs before deciding what to read fully
  • Building a literature matrix across a set of papers
  • Librarians and study-skills teams wanting an institutional licence

More comparisons

All Consensus alternatives →All Scholarcy alternatives →Browse all Academic Search & Literature Review →