Skip to content
effecthub

Cohesive vs Copy.ai

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Cohesive starts at $25, Copy.ai at $24. Only Cohesive has a free tier. Only Copy.ai ships a public API.

Side by side

FactCohesiveCopy.ai
CategoryAI Writing AssistantsCopywriting & Ad Copy
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at$25 month$24 month
Public APINoYes
PlatformsWebWeb, API
CompanyCohesiveCopyAI, Inc.
Launched20232020
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Cohesive

A 2023-era template-and-editor product that is still online but shows no sign of being worked on. At $25 per editor it is priced against Copy.ai and Writesonic while shipping older models, so there is no reason to choose it today.

Pros

  • Template library is broad and organised by job, which lowers the blank-page problem
  • Real-time collaborative editing is unusual at this price point
  • Images and voice generation live in the same editor as the text

Cons

  • Pricing page still advertises GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 as the model tiers, two model generations behind
  • Blog last published in August 2024 and terms unchanged since September 2023
  • Subpages redirect to plain HTTP rather than HTTPS
  • Per-editor pricing gets expensive for a team while capping template runs at 150 a month

Copy.ai

Worth it if you are a go-to-market team that will actually build workflows; if you just want a writing assistant, the free plan is gone and a general chatbot costs less.

Pros

  • Workflows chain research, enrichment and writing instead of one-shot prompts
  • Chat seats are unlimited-word and cover five users at the entry price
  • Now backed by a larger RevOps suite rather than a standalone startup

Cons

  • Entry price climbed as the product moved upmarket away from individuals
  • Nothing exists between the $29 Chat seat and the $1,000/mo Growth tier
  • Workflow credits meter compute, so running cost is hard to predict up front
  • Roadmap now serves Fullcast's revenue-operations story, not writers

Which one fits

Choose Cohesive if you need

  • Someone who specifically wants a template-picker workflow rather than an open chat box
  • Small teams that want text, images and voiceover in one document surface

Choose Copy.ai if you need

  • Sales and marketing teams automating account research and outbound sequences
  • RevOps groups already inside the Fullcast planning and compensation stack
  • Companies that want CRM data pulled into generated content automatically

All Cohesive alternatives →All Copy.ai alternatives →Browse all AI Writing Assistants