Skip to content
effecthub

Aster Lab vs Glasp

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both — Aster Lab is free to use, Glasp has a free plan
Public API
Glasp has one; not confirmed by us for Aster Lab
Higher Trust score
Glasp — 76 vs 63 for Aster Lab
Best fit
Aster Lab: Students turning a single lecture video into a quiz for review · Glasp: Students and researchers collecting cited passages across the web and PDFs
Platforms
Aster Lab: Web · Glasp: Web, Chrome extension, iOS, Android

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactAster LabGlasp
CategoryStudy Tools & FlashcardsNote-taking & Second Brain
Pricing modelFreeFreemium
Starts at—$12.50/mo
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score63 / 10076 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, Chrome extension, iOS, Android, API
Company—Glasp Inc.
Launched—2021
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 29, 2026

What our research says

Aster Lab

Aster Lab is handy for converting a long YouTube lecture into something you can actually study from, but the lack of any visible pricing, company name, or team page is worth pausing on for a tool that expects people to upload PDFs and link personal video sources. Treat it as an unverified free tool rather than a service to trust with sensitive documents.

Pros

  • Generates summary, quiz, and flashcards from one input
  • Accepts both YouTube links and PDF uploads
  • No account or payment required to try it

Cons

  • No company name or location published; the about page gives only one individual's contact details
  • No stated pricing beyond an optional Patreon support tier
  • No API or platform beyond the web app

Glasp

Glasp fits students, researchers and writers who read a lot online and want every quote kept with its source and searchable later. People who want their reading private by default, or who mostly need a full note editor rather than a highlighter, should look elsewhere.

Pros

  • Free plan keeps unlimited highlighting plus exports and Notion sync
  • Works across Chrome, Safari, Edge, Brave, Firefox, Opera and mobile
  • Each highlight keeps its source metadata, so quotes stay cited
  • MCP connector and API make the library usable from other AI tools

Cons

  • Highlights are public by default; privacy is a paid feature
  • Free AI allowances are small, especially video summaries
  • Social feed is of limited use to people who read alone

Which one fits

Choose Aster Lab if you need

  • Students turning a single lecture video into a quiz for review
  • Casual use converting a PDF into flashcards

Choose Glasp if you need

  • Students and researchers collecting cited passages across the web and PDFs
  • Writers keeping a swipe file of quotes for drafting with ChatGPT or Claude
  • Readers who want Kindle and web highlights in one library

Aster Lab vs Glasp: the questions people ask

Is Aster Lab cheaper than Glasp?

Aster Lab is free to use; Glasp starts at $12.50/mo.

Does Aster Lab or Glasp have a free tier?

Both: Aster Lab is free to use, and Glasp has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Aster Lab or Glasp?

Glasp ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Aster Lab is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Aster Lab alternatives →Browse all Study Tools & Flashcards →