Skip to content
effecthub

Apify vs Hyperbrowser

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Apify — $19/mo vs $30/mo for Hyperbrowser
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Apify — 94 vs 68 for Hyperbrowser
Best fit
Apify: Teams that would rather rent a maintained scraper than babysit their own · Hyperbrowser: Running browser agents at scale without managing a browser fleet

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactApifyHyperbrowser
CategoryWeb Scraping & Data ExtractionBrowser Automation Agents
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$19/mo$30/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score94 / 10068 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIAPI, Web
CompanyApify Technologies s.r.o.—
Launched2015—
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 22, 2026

What our research says

Apify

The Actor marketplace is the draw: for most popular sites someone has already built and maintains the scraper, and agent-facing interfaces (API, MCP) are first-class. Costs need watching, since compute units plus per-Actor fees stack on top of the subscription and are hard to predict before you run at volume.

Pros

  • Huge catalog of maintained scrapers for common targets
  • Real free tier with $5 of usage and no card required
  • SDKs, CLI, proxies and scheduling in one platform
  • Published discounts for startups, universities and nonprofits

Cons

  • Two-layer pricing (subscription plus usage plus Actor fees) complicates forecasting
  • Marketplace Actor quality varies by author
  • Large-scale scraping raises site-terms and legal questions the platform leaves to you

Hyperbrowser

Hyperbrowser is infrastructure and is priced like it: a published per-unit rate card down to $0.001 a page, a free tier of 5,000 credits, and $30 and $100 plans that are really prepaid usage. Sessions, scraping endpoints and agent runners share one credit balance, which makes cost modelling straightforward until proxies enter the picture - proxy data at $10 a gigabyte will dominate any scraping bill.

Pros

  • Full per-unit price list published on the pricing page, down to $0.001 a page
  • A free tier of 5,000 credits - $5 of usage - is enough to run a real test
  • Connects with Playwright, Puppeteer or Selenium, so existing scripts move over unchanged
  • Stealth mode, proxy routing, multi-region sessions, static IPs, profiles and recordings are built in
  • Agent runners (HyperAgent, Browser Use) bill through the same credit balance

Cons

  • Proxy data at $10 per GB can dwarf every other line on the invoice
  • The $30 and $100 plans are usage buckets, not flat fees - a heavy month spills past the included credits
  • No company name, country or team is published on the site
  • Everything is SDK and API driven; there is nothing for a non-developer to click

Which one fits

Choose Apify if you need

  • Teams that would rather rent a maintained scraper than babysit their own
  • AI builders feeding agents live web data through the API or MCP server
  • Developers monetizing crawlers without running infrastructure

Choose Hyperbrowser if you need

  • Running browser agents at scale without managing a browser fleet
  • Scraping sites that need stealth, proxy rotation or persistent logged-in profiles
  • Teams already on Playwright or Puppeteer who want a remote target

Apify vs Hyperbrowser: the questions people ask

Is Apify cheaper than Hyperbrowser?

On published entry prices, Apify starts lower — $19/mo against $30/mo for Hyperbrowser. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Apify or Hyperbrowser have a free tier?

Both: Apify has a free tier, and Hyperbrowser has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Apify or Hyperbrowser?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

Browse all Web Scraping & Data Extraction →