ANDRE vs Julius AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan: Only Julius AI (ANDRE has paid plans only)
Best fit: ANDRE: Teams sitting on survey exports with no analyst to interpret them · Julius AI: Marketers, founders and students who need quick descriptive statistics and charts from CSV or Excel files
Trust score: About even — ANDRE 92, Julius AI 92
Status: Both up at our last check (Sep 6, 2026)

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

ANDREUpload a survey export and get back a cleaned, charted report with written conclusions in about 15 minutes

Julius AIChat interface that writes and runs Python over your spreadsheets and databases to answer analysis questions

Side by side

Fact	ANDRE	Julius AI
Category	Survey & Feedback Analysis	Data Analysis Assistants
Pricing model	Paid	Freemium
Starts at	$945/mo	—
Trust score	92 / 100	92 / 100
Platforms	Web	Web
Company	Agentic Agency AG	Caesar Labs, Inc.
Last verified	Sep 6, 2026	Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

ANDRE

ANDRE is one of the few AI analysis tools that swallows an SPSS .SAV file and hands back a finished report rather than a chat transcript, and doing cleaning, charting and narrative in one pass genuinely saves a day of work. The pricing is the problem: $945 a month for three reports and a 4 MB upload cap prices out exactly the small teams the marketing targets.

Pros

Accepts SPSS .SAV alongside CSV and XLSX, which most AI analysis tools will not touch
Cleaning, charts and written conclusions come out of a single pass instead of three tools
Priced by reports and file size rather than seats, so an occasional user is not paying per head
Free trial with no upfront payment on every tier

Cons

The entry tier is $945 a month for only three reports
A 4 MB upload cap on Startup rules out large raw exports with open-text answers
No API, so it cannot be wired into a recurring research pipeline
The vendor publishes no founding date or team page

Julius AI

Julius is the pick for an analyst who wants a chart or a regression from a spreadsheet in a sentence and can read the generated Python well enough to check it. It stops short of being infrastructure: there is no API to call it from your own product, data leaves your machine for its cloud, and the plan line-up has shifted often enough that the price you read in a review is probably not the one at checkout.

Pros

Executes real Python rather than guessing numbers from text, and shows the code it ran
Produces charts, Excel workbooks and slides from one chat, not just answers
Connectors for databases and ad platforms and a secret-key store for calling your own services
Vendor states uploaded data is not used to train models, and offers a free tier to test with

Cons

No public API or embedding path for other products
Pricing has changed repeatedly and the site blocks non-browser reads, so the current rate must be checked at checkout
Message and credit caps on paid tiers can be exhausted by a single large exploratory session
Entity naming differs between the terms (Caesar Labs, Inc.) and the privacy policy (Julius AI Inc.)

Which one fits

Choose ANDRE if you need

Teams sitting on survey exports with no analyst to interpret them
Researchers who need SPSS .SAV files read without owning SPSS
One-off projects where a finished, shareable report matters more than a live dashboard

Choose Julius AI if you need

Marketers, founders and students who need quick descriptive statistics and charts from CSV or Excel files
Analysts who want a first pass at cleaning, joins and visualisation before refining it themselves
Teams connecting Snowflake or ad-platform data for ad-hoc questions without a BI project