Skip to content
effecthub

Andi vs Xdash

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Andi — 87 vs 78 for Xdash
Best fit
Andi: Privacy-conscious users who want no account and no tracking · Xdash: users wanting cited, synthesized answers instead of a list of links
Platforms
Andi: Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension · Xdash: Web

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactAndiXdash
CategoryAI Search & Answer EnginesAI Search & Answer Engines
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at—$15/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score87 / 10078 / 100
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, APIWeb, API
CompanyLazyWeb Inc.Xdash
Launched2022—
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 14, 2026

What our research says

Andi

Worth keeping as a private, ad-free second opinion next to Google, and it genuinely predates most of the AI-search wave. Answer depth and follow-up reasoning still sit behind Perplexity; the new usage-priced Search API and MCP server make the same index usable from code, though its rate card is not published up front.

Pros

  • Free with no ads, no sign-up and no personal-data tracking
  • Chrome extension and PWA make it easy to set as the default engine
  • Answers carry source citations and low-quality pages are filtered out
  • Search API and remote MCP server expose the same index to developers

Cons

  • Small team competing against very well-funded rivals
  • No team workspace, export or saved-research features in the consumer app
  • Handles complex, chained questions less well than Perplexity
  • API pricing is outcome-based with no published per-query rate card

Xdash

Xdash sits in the answer-engine category, search plus synthesis plus citations, but its own homepage now reads more like a general chat assistant with file upload than the search-first pitch used in earlier coverage, which makes it hard to say exactly what the current product emphasizes without testing it directly. The API option is a real differentiator for anyone wanting to build search on top of it rather than just use the web app.

Pros

  • combines real-time search with cited, synthesized answers
  • offers both a web app and a developer API with SDKs
  • supports uploading files directly into a conversation
  • has a free tier based on third-party pricing listings

Cons

  • the product's current framing on its own homepage differs from how earlier third-party reviews described it, creating uncertainty about current focus
  • no company headquarters confirmed beyond the founder's identity
  • pricing figures come from a third-party aggregator, not the vendor's own site

Which one fits

Choose Andi if you need

  • Privacy-conscious users who want no account and no tracking
  • Quick factual lookups where you want to see the sources
  • Developers wiring web search into AI agents through an API or MCP server

Choose Xdash if you need

  • users wanting cited, synthesized answers instead of a list of links
  • developers wanting to call a search or answer API directly via Python or JS
  • quick research questions where file upload into the conversation helps

Andi vs Xdash: the questions people ask

Is Andi cheaper than Xdash?

Xdash starts at $15/mo. Andi has a free tier; what its paid plans cost is not confirmed by us yet.

Does Andi or Xdash have a free tier?

Both: Andi has a free tier, and Xdash has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Andi or Xdash?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

Browse all AI Search & Answer Engines →