Vulse
Verified Oct 15, 2026 ActiveLinkedIn employee-advocacy platform that schedules team posts, matches each person's tone, and tracks the analytics.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Paid
- Paid options from
- $6/seat/mo
- Billing
- Per seat, monthly
Priced in GBP per seat per month, from about £5 at higher seat tiers up to £16 for small teams; converted here to approximate USD.
Use tool ↗About Vulse
Vulse is a Manchester, UK-based platform built specifically for LinkedIn employee advocacy: getting a company's own staff to post and be seen. It uses direct, approved LinkedIn API access to schedule posts, match each contributor's own tone of voice, run team leaderboards, and pull analytics that a personal LinkedIn account can't normally see. It supports multiple profiles under one workspace plus basic community-management features for replying to engagement. The company grew out of the social media agency Social Republic, whose past clients include Disney and the NHS, and it prices per seat with volume discounts as a team grows past ten users.
- Platforms
- Web
- API
- Not confirmed
- Last verified
- Oct 15, 2026
Verified sources
- Vulse's homepage describes it as an employee advocacy platform with direct LinkedIn API access, tone-matching, and analytics, with customers including Microsoft, Adidas, and Disneyvulse.co ↗
- Vulse's pricing page shows per-seat GBP pricing starting around £5/user/month at higher seat countsvulse.co ↗
Is Vulse legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Amazon, valid until Feb 18, 2027Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 15, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 15, 2026The site answered
- Operated by
- Vulse, United KingdomOur research, card verified Sep 1, 2026
Pros & cons of Vulse
Vulse is narrowly built for one job, turning employees into a LinkedIn distribution channel, rather than being a general social scheduler. Its direct LinkedIn API access is a real differentiator versus tools that automate through a browser, but the product is worth little to a team not already committed to LinkedIn as a channel.
Pros
- holds direct, approved LinkedIn API access rather than relying on browser automation
- matches scheduled posts to each employee's own tone of voice
- team leaderboards and analytics purpose-built for advocacy programs
- per-seat pricing scales down at higher headcounts
Cons
- only covers LinkedIn, so it's a second tool for any other channel
- pricing is quoted in GBP by default and needs converting for USD budgeting
- no free tier to try before adding seats
Best for
- B2B marketing teams running employee advocacy programs on LinkedIn
- agencies managing LinkedIn presence for multiple client teams
- organizations wanting per-employee LinkedIn analytics, not just company-page stats
Not for
- teams needing coverage of platforms beyond LinkedIn
- solo creators who don't need multi-profile or team leaderboard features
Alternatives to Vulse
AI tools by profession
Social Media Management is one of the jobs on these pages: