Runbase
Verified Oct 15, 2026 ActivePay-per-use API that reaches OpenAI, Google, ByteDance, Kling, and Hailuo image and video models through one endpoint and one key.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Paid
- Paid options from
- $0.03/image
- Billing
- Metered · per image
Pay-per-use with no subscription: the cheapest listed rate is $0.03 per image (Nano Banana); other models range up to roughly $0.66 per second of video (Seedance 2.0) or per-clip pricing like $0.33 for a 720p Veo 3.1 Fast clip.
Use tool ↗About Runbase
Runbase is a unified API for AI image and video generation: one endpoint and one API key reach models from OpenAI, Google, ByteDance, Kling, and Hailuo instead of separate accounts and SDKs for each. Pricing is entirely pay-per-use, priced per image or per second of video depending on the model, with failed generation tasks refunded automatically. It targets developers and small companies who want generation capability without negotiating separate contracts with each model vendor, and includes a browser-based playground for testing a model before writing integration code. No company name, founders, or headquarters location is disclosed anywhere on the site.
- Platforms
- Web · API
- API
- Yes
- Last verified
- Oct 15, 2026
Verified sources
- Homepage lists per-image and per-second prices across named models (OpenAI, Google, ByteDance, Kling, Hailuo)runbase.net ↗
- Docs page confirms the single REST API design, no SDK required, and automatic refunds for failed generationsrunbase.net ↗
Is Runbase legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- Domain registered
- May 27, 2026Registry record (RDAP), registrar Cloudflare, Inc., looked up Sep 6, 2026
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Google Trust Services, valid until Dec 21, 2026Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 15, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 15, 2026The site answered
Pros & cons of Runbase
Runbase's value proposition is straightforward: reach several image and video generation models through one API and one bill instead of separate vendor accounts, at rates the site claims run well under paying each provider directly. Pure pay-per-use pricing is easy to test cheaply but can add up unpredictably at production volume without a spending cap in place.
Pros
- Single API key reaches multiple providers (OpenAI, Google, ByteDance, Kling, Hailuo)
- Transparent per-unit pricing shown for specific named models
- Failed generation tasks are refunded automatically
- Browser-based playground for testing before writing code
Cons
- No company name, founders, or location disclosed
- Pure usage-based billing has no published spending cap or budget alert mentioned
- Savings claims versus competitors are the vendor's own framing, not independently audited
Best for
- Developers who want to try several image or video models without separate vendor contracts
- Small teams building features that call generation models occasionally rather than constantly
- Anyone who wants a browser playground to test a model before writing integration code
Not for
- High-volume production workloads that need predictable, capped monthly costs
- Teams needing a named vendor and support contract before integrating a generation API
Watch out: There is no subscription or spending cap visible, so per-unit costs across many models and requests can accumulate quickly without the user tracking usage manually.
Alternatives to Runbase
Runbase head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.