Skip to content
effecthub

Reelyze vs vidIQ

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Reelyze publishes a starting price ($19); vidIQ does not. Both have a free tier. Only Reelyze ships a public API.

ReelyzeAnalyses short-form videos frame by frame to show where viewers drop off, then writes scripts from what your own account proves works.vidIQYouTube growth analytics with AI ideas, thumbnails and coaching

Side by side

FactReelyzevidIQ
CategoryVideo Analysis & SearchSEO Tools
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$19 month—
Public APIYesNo
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, iOS, Android, Chrome Ext
Company—vidIQ
Launched—2011
Last verifiedSep 1, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Reelyze

Grounding the script suggestions in your own retention data is what separates this from the generic hook generators — advice comes from what your audience actually watched, not from a template library. The published usage numbers are modest (742 creators at the time of writing), so this is an early product rather than an established one.

Pros

  • Frame-by-frame retention analysis with timestamped drop-offs
  • Competitor tracking across Instagram, TikTok and YouTube Shorts
  • Scripts generated from your own performance data
  • API access on the top tier, plus a skill file for AI agents

Cons

  • Self-reported user base is small (742 creators)
  • Analysis counts are capped at every tier
  • No company name or country disclosed

vidIQ

The default second screen for creators who optimise before they publish, and the in-page extension stats are the actual product; the AI layer is a convenience bolted on top. An established channel with an editor and a strategist is mostly paying for numbers YouTube Studio already gives away.

Pros

  • the Chrome extension puts stats directly on YouTube pages, which dashboard-only rivals cannot match
  • the free tier is genuinely usable for keyword and trend checks
  • mobile apps keep the daily-ideas loop going away from a desk
  • channel-aware coaching beats generic prompt-and-hope title generators

Cons

  • credit metering means heavy thumbnail or clipping use drains a month's allowance fast
  • pricing is aggressively localised and promo-driven, so the sticker price is rarely stable
  • no public API
  • AI Coach advice turns generic once a channel has a settled niche

Which one fits

Choose Reelyze if you need

  • Creators diagnosing why a reel underperformed
  • Anyone tracking competitors across three short-form platforms
  • Teams wanting scripts grounded in their own analytics

Choose vidIQ if you need

  • solo creators under roughly 100k subscribers who need topic and keyword direction
  • researching competitor tags, upload cadence and outlier videos
  • batch-generating thumbnail concepts and title variants before publishing

More comparisons

Browse all Video Analysis & Search →