Skip to content
effecthub

Rask AI vs Translate.Video

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Rask AI starts at $60, Translate.Video at $9. Both have a free tier. Only Rask AI ships a public API.

Rask AIVideo dubbing, translation and lip sync in 130+ languagesTranslate.VideoDubs and subtitles video into 75-plus languages with cloned voices

Side by side

FactRask AITranslate.Video
CategoryVideo Dubbing & TranslationVideo Dubbing & Translation
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$60 month$9 month
Public APIYesNo
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, Chrome Ext
CompanyBrask Inc.Apex Future Labs Private Limited
Launched—2020
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Rask AI

The strongest pick when lip sync matters and you are localizing a back catalogue rather than one video. If you only need translated subtitles or a voiceover track, you are massively overpaying — cheaper transcription tools cover that.

Pros

  • Transcription, translation, voice cloning and lip sync run as one pipeline instead of four tools
  • Production API with webhooks on higher tiers, so batch localization can be automated
  • Voice cloning preserves the original speaker's timbre across languages
  • Annual billing roughly halves the rate (Creator drops from $60 to $33/mo)

Cons

  • Monthly-billed rates are steep: $60/mo buys as little as 25 minutes
  • Enhanced lip sync consumes 3x minutes, so quotas evaporate faster than the headline number suggests
  • Free tier is 3 minutes — enough to judge voice quality, not enough to judge a real workflow
  • API is throttled at Creator level; production API needs Creator Pro or above

Translate.Video

Cheap way to try dubbing occasionally, but the per-minute economics turn hostile fast — $9 buys twenty minutes and the next rung is $99. Count your monthly minutes first, because that number decides everything about whether this works for you.

Pros

  • Seventy-five-plus languages in one upload-to-output flow
  • Voice cloning is included rather than sold as a separate add-on
  • $9 entry price is unusually low for a dubbing product
  • Companion Chrome extension plus sibling tools for image and website translation

Cons

  • The Basic-to-Pro jump is eleven times the price for five times the minutes
  • The $0 plan grants no dubbing minutes, so it cannot exercise the core feature
  • No public API
  • Attention is split between the Translate.Video and Vitra.ai brands, which clouds where development goes

Which one fits

Choose Rask AI if you need

  • YouTube channels and course creators republishing an existing library into other languages
  • Marketing teams localizing product and training video into 10+ markets
  • Agencies that need an API to push localization jobs in bulk with webhooks

Choose Translate.Video if you need

  • Creators localising a handful of short videos each month
  • Marketing teams testing whether a second-language audience exists at all
  • Anyone who wants subtitles, dubbing and a voice clone from a single upload

More comparisons

Browse all Video Dubbing & Translation →