Rask AI vs Translate.Video

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan: Translate.Video — $9/mo vs $39/mo for Rask AI
Free plan: Both have one
Public API: Rask AI has one; not confirmed by us for Translate.Video
Best fit: Rask AI: YouTube channels and course creators republishing an existing library into other languages · Translate.Video: Creators localising a handful of short videos each month
Platforms: Rask AI: Web · Translate.Video: Web, Chrome extension

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Rask AIVideo translation, dubbing and lip sync across 135+ languages, billed by minutes of translated output.

Translate.VideoDubs and subtitles video into 75-plus languages with cloned voices

Side by side

Fact	Rask AI	Translate.Video
Category	Video Dubbing & Translation	Video Dubbing & Translation
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Starts at	$39/mo	$9/mo
Public API	Yes	Not confirmed
Trust score	90 / 100	91 / 100
Platforms	Web, API	Web, Chrome extension
Company	Brask Inc.	Apex Future Labs Private Limited
Launched	—	2020
Last verified	Oct 15, 2026	Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

Rask AI

The strongest pick when lip sync matters and you are localizing a back catalogue rather than one video. If you only need translated subtitles or a voiceover track, you are overpaying — cheaper transcription tools cover that.

Pros

Transcription, translation, voice cloning and lip sync run as one pipeline instead of four tools
Production API with webhooks from Creator Pro up, so batch localization can be automated
Voice cloning keeps the original speaker's timbre across 32 languages
Annual billing cuts the rate by roughly 30% (Creator drops from $39 to $28 a month)

Cons

Entry plan is $39 a month for 25 minutes, about $1.56 per finished minute on monthly billing
Enhanced lip sync consumes 3x minutes, so quotas run out faster than the headline number suggests
Free trial is 3 minutes — enough to judge voice quality, not a real workflow
Creator gets only a limited API; production API needs Creator Pro or above

Translate.Video

Cheap way to try dubbing occasionally, but the per-minute economics turn hostile fast — $9 buys twenty minutes and the next rung is $99. Count your monthly minutes first, because that number decides everything about whether this works for you.

Pros

Seventy-five-plus languages in one upload-to-output flow
Voice cloning is included rather than sold as a separate add-on
$9 entry price is unusually low for a dubbing product
Companion Chrome extension plus sibling tools for image and website translation

Cons

The Basic-to-Pro jump is eleven times the price for five times the minutes
The $0 plan grants no dubbing minutes, so it cannot exercise the core feature
No public API
Attention is split between the Translate.Video and Vitra.ai brands, which clouds where development goes

Which one fits

Choose Rask AI if you need

YouTube channels and course creators republishing an existing library into other languages
Marketing teams localizing product and training video into 10+ markets
Agencies that need an API to push localization jobs in bulk with webhooks

Choose Translate.Video if you need

Creators localising a handful of short videos each month
Marketing teams testing whether a second-language audience exists at all
Anyone who wants subtitles, dubbing and a voice clone from a single upload