Skip to content
effecthub

Lumen5 vs Steve AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Steve AI — $10/mo vs $19/mo for Lumen5
Free plan
Both have one
Best fit
Lumen5: Content marketing teams recycling a blog backlog into LinkedIn and Instagram clips · Steve AI: L&D and internal training teams producing explainer or policy videos
Trust score
About even — Lumen5 96, Steve AI 94
Status
Both up at our last check (Oct 15, 2026)

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactLumen5Steve AI
CategoryText-to-Video GeneratorsText-to-Video Generators
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$19/mo$10/mo
Trust score96 / 10094 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb
CompanyLumen5Animaker Inc.
Launched20172022
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Lumen5

A content-repurposing machine, not a video editor: it is best when you already have written material and need twenty passable videos a month, worst when you want one video that looks authored. Buy it for volume and brand consistency, not for craft.

Pros

  • Brand kits genuinely enforce consistency, which most text-to-video rivals do poorly
  • Text-to-scene splitting saves the tedious storyboard step on long articles
  • Free tier is usable for evaluating the workflow end to end
  • Nine years of operation and DAM integrations make it a safer procurement choice than newer tools

Cons

  • Stock-footage matching often needs manual replacement to avoid generic visuals
  • Older, template-driven approach compared with generative video tools that render original shots
  • Any API access is enterprise-side and not documented for self-serve users
  • Pricing page renders only in-browser, so plan costs are hard to compare before signing up

Steve AI

The reason to pick Steve over Pictory or InVideo is cartoon and whiteboard animation — almost nobody else generates those from a script. Pick it for training and explainer work, not for anything that needs to look photoreal.

Pros

  • Animation and whiteboard styles are a genuine gap in the text-to-video field
  • Watermarks are removed on every paid tier, including the $10 entry plan
  • Exports are unlimited on all plans; only generation minutes are metered
  • Audio-to-video means an existing podcast or narration can drive the edit

Cons

  • Resolution is tiered: 720p at $10, 1080p at $30, 2K at $40, 4K only on Enterprise
  • Starter at $30 buys the same 100 video minutes as Basic at $10 — you are paying for pixels
  • Generative AI credits are a separate, small allowance (15 minutes on the top self-serve plan)
  • No developer API, so batch or pipeline use is manual

Which one fits

Choose Lumen5 if you need

  • Content marketing teams recycling a blog backlog into LinkedIn and Instagram clips
  • L&D and internal comms teams turning documents into explainer videos
  • Agencies producing repeatable social output for multiple clients under brand kits

Choose Steve AI if you need

  • L&D and internal training teams producing explainer or policy videos
  • Faceless YouTube and social channels that want an animated look
  • Marketers who need the same script rendered in several styles for testing

Lumen5 vs Steve AI: the questions people ask

Is Lumen5 cheaper than Steve AI?

On published entry prices, Steve AI starts lower — $10/mo against $19/mo for Lumen5. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Lumen5 or Steve AI have a free tier?

Both: Lumen5 has a free tier, and Steve AI has a free tier.

All Lumen5 alternatives →Browse all Text-to-Video Generators →